Housing Discrimination: Fight Back and Win
Landlord discriminated against you based on race, disability, children, or other protected class? The Fair Housing Act protects you. File free HUD complaint within 1 year. Get $150,000+ damages. 70% of investigated cases find discrimination occurred.
Your Housing Discrimination Issues
Select your specific housing discrimination concern to learn your rights, see compensation amounts, and start your claim
Rental Refusal & Denial
Landlord refused to rent to you based on race, disability, family status, source of income, or national origin
Discriminatory Harassment
Landlord/tenant harassment, slurs, intimidation, or hostile environment based on protected status
Different Terms & Conditions
Higher rent, higher deposits, stricter lease terms, or different amenities based on protected class
Discriminatory Eviction
Evicted in retaliation, without legitimate cause, or based on protected characteristic
Disability Discrimination & ADA
Denied reasonable accommodation request (service animal, mobility access), or refused to modify unit
Familial Status Discrimination
Refused to rent to families with children, charged more, imposed restrictions (no kids in pools/areas)
Source of Income Discrimination
Refused to accept Section 8 vouchers, disability benefits, or other protected income sources
Discriminatory Advertising
Ads with discriminatory language, steering to/from certain communities, or exclusionary practices
"We Don't Rent to Your Kind" Still Happens in 2025
Keisha Williams thought she'd found the perfect apartment in Baton Rouge. The two-bedroom unit was within her budget, close to her daughter's school, and the property manager seemed friendly on the phone. That changed the moment Keisha showed up for the viewing.
"The woman's whole demeanor shifted when she saw I was Black," Keisha recalls. "Suddenly the unit that was 'definitely available' thirty minutes ago was 'probably already rented.' Then she actually said the quiet part out loud: 'We don't really rent to... people like you here.'"
That was in September 2024. Not 1964. Last year.
The $6.1 Million Reality Check
If you think housing discrimination is ancient history, the Department of Justice would like a word. In 2024 alone, they extracted $6.1 million in settlements from just two companies whose "sophisticated" tenant screening algorithms were basically high-tech redlining. RealPage Inc. paid $3.8 million. SafeRent Solutions coughed up $2.28 million. Their crime? Software that systematically assigned lower scores to Black and Hispanic renters, even when they had identical qualifications to white applicants.
Think about that. These companies built discrimination into their code. They automated racism and sold it as a service to thousands of landlords nationwide. And they got caught.
1 in 4: The Discrimination Lottery Nobody Wants to Win
Here's a fun statistic that's not actually fun at all: Black and Hispanic renters face discrimination in approximately 1 out of every 4 rental interactions. That's not a typo. Twenty-five percent. A quarter of the time, if you're a person of color looking for housing, someone's going to try to illegally deny you, steer you elsewhere, quote you a higher price, or make your life harder because of your race.
And that's just what we can measure through testing. The real number is probably higher because discrimination has gotten sneakier. Landlords don't usually say "we don't rent to your kind" anymore (though as Keisha learned, some still do). Instead, they ghost you after learning your race. They suddenly "remember" another applicant. The credit score requirement mysteriously increases. The unit that's been online for three months? Rented yesterday. So sorry.
33,007 People Said "Enough" Last Year
HUD received 33,007 housing discrimination complaints in fiscal year 2023. That's 90 complaints every single day. And those are just the people who knew their rights and had the energy to fight back. For every person who files a complaint, how many others just move on, exhausted and defeated, adding another apartment rejection to their growing pile?
The most common complaint? Disability discrimination - landlords refusing emotional support animals, denying wheelchair ramps, asking invasive medical questions. Second place goes to race. Third is familial status - the "no kids allowed" crowd who apparently think the Fair Housing Act is a suggestion.
The Algorithm Excuse: "The Computer Made Me Do It"
The newest trend in housing discrimination is hiding behind technology. Landlords use tenant screening services that spit out a score, then claim they're just following the "objective" recommendation. But when SafeRent's algorithm was giving a Black woman with perfect credit a lower score than a white man with bankruptcies, that's not objectivity - it's digitized discrimination.
The algorithm doesn't see race, they claim. But it sees zip codes (which correlate with race). It sees names (which correlate with race). It sees credit patterns that reflect centuries of economic discrimination (which definitely correlate with race). The algorithm is just math, they say. Yeah, racist math.
Miguel Rodriguez discovered this firsthand when he applied for an apartment in Los Angeles. Excellent income, stellar references, 720 credit score. The screening service gave him a "marginal" rating. His white colleague with a 680 score and a recent eviction? "Qualified." The property manager shrugged: "I don't make the rules, the system does."
The system. Always the system's fault. Never mind who built the system, who profits from the system, who could change the system with one software update but doesn't.
Meanwhile, in California's Central Valley...
October 2024: The Justice Department sues 18 rental properties in Kern County for discriminating against families with children. Their ingenious strategy? Occupancy limits designed to mathematically exclude anyone under 18. Two people max in a two-bedroom apartment. Sorry, single parent with one child - that's three people. Too many. But a couple with no kids? Come right in!
They also refused to let disabled tenants install grab bars. In their own bathrooms. At the tenants' expense. Because apparently, not falling in the shower is a luxury they couldn't allow.
What This Costs You (Spoiler: Everything)
When Jamal Thompson was denied an apartment near his new job in Seattle, he had to settle for one 45 minutes away. That's 90 minutes of commuting every day. 450 minutes a week. 23,400 minutes a year. That's 390 hours - nearly 10 work weeks - lost to discrimination. Gas money: $3,000 extra per year. Wear on his car: another $2,000. Time with his kids: priceless, and stolen.
When the Martinez family was steered away from good school districts because "those neighborhoods aren't really for families like yours," their children ended up in underfunded schools. Lower test scores. Fewer opportunities. Generational impact. How do you calculate those damages?
When Sarah Kim was quoted $200 more per month because the landlord assumed "your people pack too many relatives into apartments," that's $2,400 per year in discrimination tax. Over a five-year lease? $12,000 stolen.
They're Getting Caught, and It's Getting Expensive
Here's what gives us hope: They're getting caught. The Justice Department is securing multi-million dollar settlements. HUD is investigating complaints and finding discrimination in 70% of cases that go to determination. Private lawsuits are yielding six-figure judgments. Fair housing organizations are conducting testing operations that catch discriminators red-handed.
Remember our friend Keisha from the beginning? She filed a HUD complaint. The investigation uncovered a pattern - that property manager had rejected every Black applicant for three years while maintaining a 95% white tenant population in a city that's 55% Black. The property owner is now facing a federal lawsuit, potential damages exceeding $500,000, and an injunction that would put them under monitoring for the next decade.
The manager who said "we don't rent to people like you"? Personally named in the lawsuit. Turns out saying the quiet part out loud is really expensive.
Your Move
If you've been denied housing and something felt wrong, trust that feeling. If the Available unit suddenly became Unavailable when they saw you. If your financial qualifications somehow weren't quite enough despite exceeding their stated requirements. If you faced extra scrutiny, higher deposits, or mysterious delays that white applicants didn't face. That's not paranoia. That's pattern recognition.
Document everything. Save every email, text, and voicemail. Note dates, times, and names. Screenshot the listing showing it's still available after they told you it was rented. Then file a HUD complaint. It's free. It takes 30 minutes online. HUD investigates for you.
Because here's what they don't want you to know: Fair housing lawsuits terrify landlords. The damages are real (emotional distress + economic losses + punitive damages + attorney fees). The publicity is terrible. The federal government has unlimited resources and they don't lose often. And when you win, the landlord pays your attorney fees on top of your damages. That's why fair housing attorneys work on contingency - they know they'll get paid when you win.
Housing discrimination isn't history. It's happening right now, today, in cities across America. It's hiding in algorithms, lurking in property management offices, thriving wherever people think they won't get caught.
Prove them wrong. Make discrimination expensive. Because the only thing that stops discriminatory landlords is consequences. And the consequence for "we don't rent to your kind" should be bankruptcy.
They discriminated. Now make them pay for it.
Overview: Your Rights Under the Fair Housing Act
Housing discrimination is illegal, widespread, and costly—but most victims don't know their rights or how to fight back. If a landlord, property manager, real estate agent, or housing provider treated you differently because of your race, disability, family status, or other protected characteristic, you have powerful legal remedies available under the federal Fair Housing Act and many state laws.
Here's what you need to know up front: the Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in nearly all housing based on seven protected classes: race, color, national origin, religion, sex (including LGBTQ+ in many jurisdictions), disability, and familial status (families with children). Many states and cities add additional protections like source of income (Section 8 vouchers), sexual orientation, gender identity, age, and military status.
You have two main paths to pursue your case: (1) File a free complaint with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) within one year of discrimination, or (2) file a private lawsuit in federal or state court within two years. You can do both. HUD investigates your complaint at no cost to you, and if they find "reasonable cause" that discrimination occurred (happens in about 70% of cases that complete investigation), you can proceed to an administrative hearing where HUD provides an attorney for free, or elect to go to federal court.
The remedies are substantial. You can recover actual damages for out-of-pocket expenses and emotional distress (typically $5,000-$50,000+), civil penalties up to $115,054 for repeat violators paid to the government, and if you file lawsuit in federal court, potentially unlimited punitive damages. Plus, if you win, the defendant must pay your attorney fees—this is mandatory under the Fair Housing Act, which is why many fair housing attorneys take cases on contingency (you pay nothing upfront, they get percentage of recovery plus defendant pays their full fees separately).
Recent major settlements illustrate the financial stakes: In 2025, Joel and Shirlee Nolen were required to establish a $960,000 settlement fund to compensate 19 discrimination victims plus pay $40,000 civil penalty. Greystar settled for $1.35 million to compensate servicemembers plus $77,370 penalty. A New York co-op paid $165,000 in damages plus $585,000 to purchase back the complainant's shares. These aren't outliers—housing discrimination cases regularly result in five- and six-figure recoveries.
The most common types of discrimination we see: landlords refusing to rent to families with children (familial status discrimination, about 15-20% of all complaints), denying reasonable accommodations for people with disabilities (refusal to allow service animals is most common), source of income discrimination against Section 8 voucher holders (in the 24 states that protect source of income), and race-based refusals or steering to certain units/buildings. All of these are violations you can challenge.
Bottom line: Housing discrimination is not just wrong—it's illegal and expensive for violators. If you experienced discrimination, document everything, file HUD complaint immediately (free and easy at hud.gov/fairhousing or call 800-669-9777), and consult a fair housing attorney for free evaluation of your case. Don't let discriminatory landlords get away with it. The laws are on your side, enforcement is active, and the financial recovery can be significant.
Protected Classes Under the Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in housing based on certain "protected classes"—characteristics that Congress and state legislatures have determined should not be grounds for denying someone housing. Understanding which classes are protected is critical because discrimination only violates the law if it's based on a protected characteristic.
7 Federal Protected Classes
The federal Fair Housing Act, enacted in 1968 and amended in 1988, prohibits discrimination based on these seven classes:
1. Race
Discrimination based on a person's race. This includes refusing to rent to someone, steering them to certain buildings or neighborhoods, charging higher rent, or providing different terms because of their race.
Example: Landlord tells Black applicant unit is rented, but continues showing it to white applicants who apply later. Landlord segregates tenants by race into different buildings in a complex.
2. Color
Discrimination based on skin color. This can occur even within the same racial group—for example, preferring lighter-skinned over darker-skinned individuals.
Example: Landlord shows preference for lighter-skinned applicants over darker-skinned applicants even if same race.
3. National Origin
Discrimination based on a person's country of origin, ancestry, or ethnicity. Includes discrimination based on accent, language, or immigration status perception (though landlords can verify legal right to rent—they just can\'t discriminate based on national origin).
Example: Landlord refuses to rent to someone with accent or foreign-sounding name. "English-only" policies that aren't narrowly job-related can violate this. Assuming someone is undocumented based on appearance/accent and refusing to rent.
4. Religion
Discrimination based on religious beliefs or practices. Landlords cannot refuse to rent based on religion, refuse religious accommodations (within reason), or harass tenants about religious practices.
Example: Refusing to rent to Muslim family. Refusing to allow Jewish tenant to install mezuzah on doorframe. Harassing tenant for wearing religious garments.
5. Sex (Gender)
Discrimination based on gender. Includes sexual harassment by landlord or property manager. Increasingly interpreted by HUD and courts to include sexual orientation and gender identity, though this remains subject to litigation in some jurisdictions.
Example: Charging women higher rent than men. Landlord making sexual advances or requesting sexual favors from tenant. Refusing to rent to same-sex couple. Evicting transgender tenant after they transition.
6. Disability
Discrimination based on physical or mental disability. Includes refusing to rent, refusing reasonable accommodations (like service/emotional support animals in no-pets building), refusing to allow reasonable modifications (tenant-paid accessibility improvements), and asking intrusive medical questions.
Example: Refusing to rent to person with wheelchair. Refusing to allow emotional support animal. Refusing to let disabled tenant install wheelchair ramp (at tenant's expense). Asking applicant to provide medical records or details of disability.
7. Familial Status
Discrimination against families with children under 18, pregnant women, or people in process of securing legal custody of children under 18 (including adoption and foster care). This is one of the most commonly violated protections.
Example: "No children" or "adults only" policies. Refusing to rent to families with kids. Segregating families with children to certain floors/buildings. Charging families higher rent or deposit. Prohibiting children from using pool or playground. Overly restrictive occupancy limits designed to exclude families.
State & Local Additional Protections
Many states and cities extend fair housing protections beyond the seven federal classes. Common additional protected classes include:
Additional State/Local Protected Classes
- Source of Income: 24 states + DC and 100+ localities prohibit discrimination based on source of income, protecting Section 8 voucher holders and others receiving housing assistance. States include California, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Oregon, Washington, and others.
- Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity: 24 states + DC explicitly protect LGBTQ+ individuals from housing discrimination. HUD also interprets federal "sex" discrimination to include sexual orientation and gender identity as of 2021.
- Age: Some states prohibit age discrimination beyond just senior housing exemptions. Protects young adults and others from arbitrary age-based refusals.
- Military/Veteran Status: Several states prohibit discrimination against servicemembers, veterans, and their families. Overlaps with federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) protections.
- Marital Status: Some states protect unmarried couples (opposite-sex and same-sex) from being refused housing.
- Criminal History: A few jurisdictions limit landlords' ability to deny housing based on criminal records, especially old or minor convictions. This is evolving area of law.
Check your state and local fair housing laws - you may have more protections than federal law provides. Search "[Your State] fair housing law protected classes" or contact local fair housing organization.
Important: If you're protected by state/local law but not federal law (example: source of income discrimination in states that protect it), file complaint with your state/local fair housing agency, not HUD. HUD only enforces federal protected classes. Most state agencies have similar complaint processes and remedies.
Types of Housing Discrimination
Housing discrimination takes many forms. Understanding the different types helps you recognize violations when they happen and articulate your complaint effectively. The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in all aspects of housing transactions, from advertising through tenancy and sale.
Refusal to Rent or Sell
The most straightforward form of discrimination: refusing to rent or sell housing to someone based on protected class. This includes telling applicants "the unit is rented" when it's still available, not returning calls or applications from protected class members, or explicitly stating they won\'t rent to certain groups.
Examples: Landlord tells Black applicant apartment is taken but continues showing it to white applicants. Property manager says "we don\'t rent to families with children." Real estate agent refuses to show homes in certain neighborhoods to minority buyers. Landlord won't return calls from applicants with Spanish-sounding names.
How to prove: Testing is very effective here. Fair housing organizations send matched testers (identical credentials except for protected characteristic) and document differential treatment. You can also show unit remained available after you were told it was rented (check online listings, drive by property). Save all communications showing landlord stopped responding after learning your protected class.
Different Terms or Conditions
Providing different terms, conditions, privileges, services, or facilities based on protected class. The housing is available, but on worse terms for protected class members.
Examples: Charging families with children higher rent or security deposit than adults-only households. Requiring people with disabilities to pay extra deposit for service animals. Providing inferior maintenance or slower repairs to minority tenants. Placing families with children in less desirable units or buildings. Restricting protected class members to certain floors or sections of complex.
How to prove: Comparative evidence showing others paid less or received better terms. Testimonies from other tenants describing differential treatment. Property records showing segregation patterns. Documentation of requests for repairs that went unfulfilled compared to non-protected tenants getting prompt service.
Harassment
Harassment based on protected class that interferes with enjoyment of housing. Includes sexual harassment by landlord, racial slurs or hostile environment created by landlord/property manager, and intimidation or threats.
Examples: Landlord makes repeated sexual advances to female tenant or demands sexual favors. Property manager uses racial slurs or makes comments about tenant's national origin. Landlord harasses family because they have children, complaining about normal child noise. Threatening to evict tenant because of their religion or disability.
How to prove: Document every incident immediately (date, time, what was said/done, witnesses). Save text messages, emails, voicemails with harassing content. Record conversations where legal (check your state's recording laws). Get witness statements from neighbors or others who observed harassment. In sexual harassment cases, document pattern of behavior and your rejections of advances.
Steering
Guiding or steering prospective buyers or renters toward or away from certain neighborhoods, buildings, or units based on protected class. Common in real estate sales and apartment complexes with multiple buildings.
Examples: Real estate agent shows minority buyers only homes in minority neighborhoods, not the diverse areas they requested. Property manager tells families with children they can only rent in certain buildings "where other families live." Suggesting to LGBTQ+ couple they'd be "more comfortable" in different neighborhood. Agent discourages protected class members from looking in certain areas by making negative comments about the neighborhood.
How to prove: Document which properties agent showed you vs. which you requested. Note comments agent made about neighborhoods or buildings. Testing can reveal patterns—testers from different protected classes request same criteria and are shown different properties. Compare what agent told you vs. what properties were actually available.
Denial of Reasonable Accommodation/Modification
Refusing to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, or services, or refusing to permit reasonable modifications to the premises for persons with disabilities. This is disability-specific discrimination and very common.
Reasonable accommodation examples (landlord must allow): Emotional support animal in no-pets building. Assigned accessible parking space. Modified payment due date due to SSI payment schedule. Permission for live-in caregiver. Transfer to ground-floor unit. Exception from "no waterbeds" rule for person with medical need for waterbed.
Reasonable modification examples (landlord must allow tenant to make at tenant's expense): Installing grab bars in bathroom. Installing wheelchair ramp at entrance. Lowering kitchen counters or cabinets. Widening doorways for wheelchair access. Installing visual doorbell for deaf tenant.
How to prove: Document your accommodation/modification request in writing with medical verification. Show landlord denied request. Prove accommodation was reasonable (not undue burden or fundamental alteration). For modification, show you offered to do it at your expense and restore property when moving out. If landlord demanded intrusive medical information, that's separate violation.
Common Discrimination Scenarios by Protected Class
Here are the most frequently encountered discrimination scenarios for each major protected class, based on HUD complaint data and fair housing litigation:
Disability Discrimination (Most Common)
Disability discrimination accounts for the largest percentage of fair housing complaints. The most common issues:
Top 5 Disability Discrimination Scenarios:
- Refusal to allow emotional support or service animals: Landlord says "no pets" policy applies even with doctor's letter verifying need for ESA. Landlord demands pet deposit for assistance animal. Charging pet rent for service animal. This is the #1 most common disability complaint.
- Asking intrusive medical questions: Landlord asks about diagnosis, demands medical records, or requires applicant to provide detailed health information beyond what's needed to verify disability and need for accommodation.
- Refusing accessible parking: Refusing to assign accessible parking space close to entrance for person with mobility disability. Requiring person to pay for assigned space when others don\'t pay.
- Refusing physical modifications: Not allowing tenant to install wheelchair ramp, grab bars, or other accessibility features even when tenant pays for it and agrees to restore property.
- Refusing accommodations in policies: Not allowing modified payment schedule for person receiving SSI or disability benefits. Refusing to allow live-in caregiver. Refusing to transfer to ground-floor unit.
If this happened to you: Document your disability (don't need to disclose diagnosis, just that you have disability under FHA) and need for accommodation. Request accommodation in writing with doctor's letter stating you have disability and need the accommodation. If denied, file HUD complaint immediately—disability cases have strong precedent and high success rates.
Familial Status Discrimination (Children)
Familial status discrimination is second most common and often blatant. About 2,261 familial status complaints filed in 2021 (most recent data).
Common Familial Status Violations:
- "No children" or "adults only" advertisements or statements by landlord
- Refusing to rent to families with children while renting to adults without children
- Steering families to certain buildings, floors, or units separated from adults-only areas
- Charging families higher rent or security deposit than childless tenants
- Overly restrictive occupancy limits: "2 people maximum in 2-bedroom" (designed to exclude most families—HUD uses "2 per bedroom plus 1" guideline, so 2BR should accommodate up to 5)
- Prohibiting children from using amenities like pools, playgrounds, or common areas open to adults
- Enforcing rules (noise, cleanliness) more strictly against families with children
- Terminating pregnancy discrimination: refusing to rent to pregnant woman or evicting when landlord learns tenant is pregnant
Exception: "Housing for Older Persons" (55+ or 62+ communities) is exempt from familial status rules under strict conditions. Regular apartments/houses must accept children.
Source of Income Discrimination (Section 8)
While not a federal protected class, 24 states + DC and 100+ localities prohibit source of income discrimination. This primarily affects Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher holders.
Common Source of Income Violations (in Protected Jurisdictions):
- "No Section 8" policies or advertisements stating vouchers not accepted
- Refusing to even consider voucher holders' applications
- Telling voucher holder unit is rented but showing it to non-voucher applicants
- Imposing different screening criteria on voucher holders (requiring higher credit scores, more references)
- Refusing to wait for housing authority's inspection or claiming property won\'t pass (in bad faith)
- Charging voucher holders higher rent than asking price to "make up" for program requirements
Important: Only protected in certain states/localities. Check if your jurisdiction protects source of income. If yes, file complaint with state/local fair housing agency (not HUD—HUD doesn't enforce source of income). If no, advocacy for adding source of income to Fair Housing Act continues.
2024-2025 developments: Kansas City passed source of income protection in 2024. Missouri attempted to overturn local protections in 2025 (pending). Several states considering new source of income laws. Trend is toward more protection, but progress is slow and varies by state.
Race & National Origin Discrimination
Race discrimination, the original focus of Fair Housing Act, remains prevalent. Often more subtle than familial status discrimination but still common.
Common Race/National Origin Scenarios:
- Differential treatment based on race-revealing names, voices, or appearance: told unit is available over phone but unavailable after in-person visit reveals race
- Steering minority buyers/renters to certain neighborhoods, away from predominantly white areas
- Quoting different rental terms to applicants of different races (higher rent, larger deposits for minorities)
- Applying stricter screening criteria to minority applicants (requiring more income, references, documentation than white applicants)
- Segregation within apartment complexes: placing minority tenants in certain buildings or units
- Refusing to rent to immigrants or people with accents/foreign-sounding names
- Harassment: racial slurs, hostile environment, discriminatory enforcement of rules
- Refusing to rent based on religious dress or practices (hijab, yarmulke, etc.)
Proving race discrimination: Often requires comparative evidence (testing, comparators) since landlords rarely admit racial motive. Fair housing organizations' testing evidence is very powerful. Statistical evidence showing property has few or no minority tenants despite diverse applicant pool. Temporal evidence: application proceeding normally until landlord learned your race, then sudden unavailability.
Calculate Your Potential Damages
Use our calculator to estimate what you could recover in a housing discrimination case. This includes emotional distress damages, economic losses, and civil penalties.
Housing Discrimination Damages Calculator
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the 7 protected classes under the Fair Housing Act?
Does the Fair Housing Act protect LGBTQ+ people?
Can landlords refuse to rent to families with children?
Can landlords refuse Section 8 housing vouchers?
What is a reasonable accommodation for disability, and when must landlords provide it?
How do I file a HUD complaint, and what happens next?
Can I file a lawsuit instead of (or in addition to) a HUD complaint?
What damages can I recover in a housing discrimination case?
What evidence do I need to prove housing discrimination?
How long do I have to file a housing discrimination complaint or lawsuit?
Do I need a lawyer for a housing discrimination case?
Can a landlord ask about my disability or require medical records?
Experienced Housing Discrimination? Take Action Now
Don't let discriminatory landlords or housing providers violate your rights. The Fair Housing Act gives you powerful tools to fight back and win substantial damages.
✓ File HUD complaint (free): Online at hud.gov/fairhousing or call 800-669-9777. Deadline: 1 year from discrimination.
✓ Gather evidence: Document everything—emails, texts, applications, communications, photos, witness statements.
✓ Consult attorney (free consultation): Many fair housing attorneys work on contingency. Use our calculator above to estimate your case value.
✓ Know your rights: You can recover emotional distress damages + economic losses + civil penalties up to $115,054 + attorney fees.
Housing discrimination is illegal, and violators pay. 70% of HUD investigations find reasonable cause. Cases regularly settle for $15,000-$100,000+. Pattern cases reach millions. Don't wait—act within the 1-year HUD deadline or 2-year lawsuit deadline.