Benefits denied or terminated unfairly? ERISA gives you powerful rights to appeal and sue. Learn the 180-day appeal deadline, how to fight denials, and when your employer must pay attorney fees.
Estimate your potential recovery based on denied benefits. This calculator considers whether ERISA or state law applies, affecting available remedies.
Get an estimate of your potential compensation
An employee benefits dispute occurs when an employer or benefits plan administrator denies, reduces, terminates, or miscalculates benefits to which an employee is entitled. Benefits disputes can involve health insurance claims, disability benefits (short-term or long-term), retirement plans (401k, pensions), life insurance, dental/vision coverage, paid time off (PTO), vacation pay, sick leave, severance packages, and other employer-sponsored benefits. Most private employer benefit plans are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), a powerful federal law that provides specific appeal rights and lawsuit remedies. However, some benefits like PTO and vacation pay are governed by state law, not ERISA. Understanding which law applies to your specific benefit is crucial, as it determines your deadline to appeal (often 180 days under ERISA), available damages (ERISA limits remedies to denied benefits only—no punitive damages or emotional distress), and whether you can sue in federal or state court. Benefits disputes are among the most common workplace legal issues, affecting millions of employees annually.
Employee benefits disputes encompass a wide range of claim types. The most common include: (1) Health insurance claim denials - when your health plan refuses to cover medical procedures, hospital stays, prescriptions, or treatments, often citing exclusions, pre-authorization requirements, or experimental treatment clauses; (2) Disability benefit denials - when short-term disability (STD) or long-term disability (LTD) insurers deny your claim, terminate benefits prematurely, or argue you can perform sedentary work despite medical evidence; (3) Retirement plan disputes - including 401(k) mismanagement, excessive fees, prohibited transactions, pension miscalculations, and denial of vested benefits; (4) Life insurance claim denials - when beneficiaries are denied death benefits due to alleged misrepresentations on applications or policy exclusions; (5) PTO and vacation pay disputes - when employers refuse to pay accrued vacation time upon termination (governed by state law, not ERISA); (6) Severance agreement disputes - when promised severance is denied or reduced; (7) COBRA continuation coverage disputes - when employers fail to offer health insurance continuation rights; (8) Pension benefit miscalculations - common in defined benefit plans when employers use incorrect salary figures or service years; (9) 401(k) matching contribution disputes - when employers fail to make promised matching contributions; (10) Flexible Spending Account (FSA) and Health Savings Account (HSA) disputes regarding reimbursements.
Understanding whether ERISA applies to your benefit is absolutely critical because it determines your procedural rights, available damages, and litigation strategy. ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) is a comprehensive federal law governing most private employer benefit plans, including health insurance, disability insurance, life insurance, retirement plans (401k, pensions), and some severance plans. ERISA preempts (overrides) state law for covered benefits, meaning you cannot sue in state court or seek state-law remedies like punitive damages, emotional distress damages, or compensatory damages. ERISA limits your recovery to the denied benefits themselves, plus potentially attorney fees if you prevail. Key ERISA features: (a) 180-day deadline to file an internal appeal after denial; (b) Exhaustion requirement - you must complete the plan's internal appeals before suing; (c) Federal court jurisdiction only; (d) Administrative record rule - courts typically review only documents submitted during the internal appeals (cannot add new evidence in court); (e) Deferential standard of review if the plan grants discretionary authority to the administrator; (f) Attorney fees may be awarded to prevailing party. Benefits NOT covered by ERISA: (1) Government employee plans (federal, state, local); (2) Church plans (unless they elect ERISA coverage); (3) PTO, vacation pay, and sick leave (these are wages under state law); (4) Severance pay in some circumstances (if not an established plan); (5) Workers' compensation; (6) Unemployment insurance; (7) Social Security disability (separate federal program). The ERISA vs. non-ERISA distinction dramatically affects case value and strategy, so proper classification is the first step in any benefits dispute.
Benefits administrators deny claims for numerous reasons, ranging from legitimate policy interpretations to bad-faith cost-cutting measures. Common denial reasons include: (1) Lack of medical necessity - health insurers frequently deny procedures they deem not medically necessary, experimental, or investigational, even when doctors recommend them; (2) Pre-existing condition exclusions - though limited by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for health insurance, still applicable to some disability and life insurance policies; (3) Procedural defects - missing pre-authorization, failure to use in-network providers, incomplete claim forms, or missed deadlines; (4) Policy exclusions - self-inflicted injuries, injuries during commission of a crime, cosmetic procedures, or activities listed as excluded; (5) Insufficient medical documentation - disability insurers often claim your medical records don't support total disability, arguing you can perform sedentary or light work; (6) Surveillance evidence - disability insurers hire private investigators to videotape claimants, then argue activities shown (taking out trash, grocery shopping) prove ability to work; (7) Independent Medical Examination (IME) opinions - insurers send claimants to their own doctors who predictably find them capable of working; (8) Definition of disability disputes - insurers argue you don't meet the policy's definition (often "own occupation" for first 24 months, then "any occupation"); (9) Exclusions for mental health conditions - some LTD policies limit mental health benefits to 24 months; (10) Retirement plan disputes - claims of unvested benefits, incorrect benefit calculations, or prohibited distribution timing; (11) Timely filing defenses - claiming you missed the plan's deadline to file a claim or appeal (strictly enforced under ERISA); (12) Coordination of benefits - reducing disability benefits dollar-for-dollar based on Social Security disability or workers' comp awards.
The ERISA appeal process is extremely technical and unforgiving. Missing a deadline or failing to submit critical evidence during the internal appeal can permanently damage your case because courts typically review only the administrative record compiled during the appeal. ERISA appeal steps: (1) Review the denial letter carefully - ERISA requires the plan to provide specific reasons for denial, references to plan provisions, and a description of additional material needed (if any). The denial must also inform you of your right to appeal and the deadline (typically 180 days for health claims, disability claims may vary by plan); (2) Request the full claim file - you have the right to request all documents, records, and other information relevant to your claim, free of charge. This includes internal guidelines, medical opinions, and vocational assessments used to deny your claim; (3) Gather additional medical evidence - obtain updated opinions from your treating physicians, specialist consultations, updated diagnostic tests (MRI, CT, bloodwork), functional capacity evaluations, and detailed residual functional capacity (RFC) assessments explaining your physical and mental limitations; (4) Obtain independent medical opinions - consider hiring your own medical expert to review the file and provide an opinion contradicting the plan's medical advisor or IME doctor; (5) Submit a detailed appeal letter - your appeal should specifically address each reason for denial, cite supporting medical evidence, reference plan provisions supporting coverage, distinguish any adverse cases cited by the plan, and argue applicable legal standards. This is your only opportunity to build the administrative record; (6) Meet the deadline - ERISA's 180-day appeal deadline is strictly enforced. Courts rarely grant extensions. Calendar the deadline immediately upon receiving the denial; (7) Follow up on pending appeals - plans have specific timeframes to decide appeals (typically 60 days for health claims, 45 days for disability claims, with possible extensions). If the plan misses its deadline, you may be entitled to proceed directly to court; (8) Prepare for potential litigation - if your appeal is denied, you have the right to sue in federal court, but courts will typically review only the evidence submitted during the internal appeal. Additional tips: Always send appeals via certified mail with return receipt; Keep copies of everything submitted; Consider hiring an ERISA attorney before submitting your appeal (attorney fees may be recovered if you prevail); Be aware that some plans require a second level of appeal before you can sue; Understand the standard of review (arbitrary and capricious vs. de novo) that will apply if you sue—this depends on plan language.
Employee benefits span numerous categories, each with distinct legal frameworks, eligibility requirements, appeal procedures, and governing statutes. Understanding which category your benefit falls into determines which law applies (ERISA, Social Security Act, state unemployment law, etc.), what deadlines you must meet, and what remedies are available.
Federal program providing monthly benefits to workers who paid FICA taxes and become disabled before retirement age. Requires 5-month waiting period. Administered by Social Security Administration. Approximately 8.9 million disabled workers received SSDI benefits in 2024. Average monthly benefit approximately $1,537. Eligibility requires sufficient work credits (typically 20 credits in last 10 years) and meeting SSA's definition of disability (inability to engage in substantial gainful activity due to medically determinable impairment expected to last 12+ months or result in death). Five-step sequential evaluation process. Initial denial rate approximately 70%. With representation and appeals to ALJ hearing level, approval rate rises to approximately 50%.
Need-based federal program for disabled individuals with limited income and resources (less than $2,000 individual/$3,000 couple in countable assets). Does not require work history. Administered by Social Security Administration. Monthly federal benefit rate $943 for individuals/$1,415 couples (2024), though states may supplement. Approximately 7.4 million people received SSI in 2024. Uses same disability definition as SSDI but stricter financial eligibility. Children can qualify based on disability and family income. SSI recipients typically also qualify for Medicaid.
Joint federal-state program providing temporary income to workers who lose jobs through no fault of their own. Funded by state and federal unemployment taxes (SUTA/FUTA). Benefit duration typically 26 weeks (shorter in some states: Florida 12-23 weeks, North Carolina 12-20 weeks based on unemployment rate). Weekly benefit amounts vary by state and prior earnings, ranging from $275 max in Florida to $1,129 max in Massachusetts (2024). Eligibility requires: (1) sufficient base period wages; (2) job loss through no fault of own (not fired for misconduct, not voluntary quit without good cause); (3) able, available, and actively seeking work. Employers can contest claims. Denied claims can be appealed to state appeals board, then state court.
Temporary federal program (March 2020 - September 2021) that expanded unemployment to self-employed, gig workers, and those with insufficient work history. Part of CARES Act COVID-19 response. Provided up to 79 weeks of benefits. Program expired September 6, 2021. Approximately $87 billion stolen through PUA fraud, leading to aggressive recovery efforts and overpayment demands. Claimants receiving overpayment notices can request waivers if overpayment was not their fault and repayment would cause financial hardship.
Monthly tax-free benefit for veterans with disabilities connected to military service. Administered by Department of Veterans Affairs. Ratings from 0% to 100% in 10% increments. Requires: (1) in-service event/injury; (2) current disability; (3) nexus (connection) between the two. Approximately 5.5 million veterans received VA disability compensation in 2024. Compensation rates increase with rating and number of dependents. 100% rating provides $3,737.85 monthly for veteran with no dependents (2024). Individual unemployability (TDIU) allows 100% compensation at lower ratings if unable to work. Secondary conditions can be service-connected (e.g., knee injury causes back problems). Presumptive conditions (Agent Orange exposure, Gulf War syndrome, burn pit exposure under PACT Act 2022) have relaxed nexus requirements. Appeals process reformed under Appeals Modernization Act (AMA) 2019, providing three lanes: supplemental claim, higher-level review, or Board appeal.
Need-based benefit for wartime veterans age 65+ or permanently disabled, with limited income. Does not require service-connected disability. Lower benefit amounts than VA disability compensation. Aid and Attendance (A&A) enhanced pension available for veterans needing help with activities of daily living. Maximum annual pension rate (2024): $16,037 for veteran alone, $26,766 with Aid and Attendance. Income and net worth limits apply.
Disability insurance purchased individually (not through employer). Not governed by ERISA, so state insurance law applies. This allows claimants to sue in state court, seek punitive damages for bad faith claim denial, and recover emotional distress damages. Policies vary in definition of disability ("own occupation" vs. "any occupation"), elimination periods (90 days to 1 year typical), benefit periods (2 years, 5 years, to age 65, or lifetime), and monthly benefit amounts (typically 60-70% of pre-disability income). Cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) and residual/partial disability riders available. Non-ERISA status is a major advantage in disputes - can sue in state court under state bad faith law.
Employer-sponsored group disability insurance governed by ERISA. Typical features: 90-180 day elimination period (must be disabled that long before benefits begin); "own occupation" definition for first 24 months (unable to perform your own job), then switches to "any occupation" (unable to perform any job); benefits continue to age 65 or Social Security retirement age; monthly benefits typically 60% of pre-disability salary, capped at $5,000-$15,000 monthly depending on plan; offsets for Social Security disability, workers' comp, and other disability benefits. Governed by ERISA, meaning limited remedies (no punitive damages, no emotional distress), federal court jurisdiction only, deferential standard of review if plan grants discretion, and strict exhaustion requirement. Major insurers include Unum, MetLife, Hartford, Cigna, Liberty Mutual, Prudential. Claim denials can be appealed internally (typically 180 days to appeal), then sued in federal court within plan's limitations period (typically 3 years).
Employer-sponsored disability insurance for temporary disabilities. Typical features: 7-14 day elimination period; benefits last 13-26 weeks; 60-70% of salary; fewer claim denials than LTD because shorter duration and less money at stake. Governed by ERISA. Often fully insured (insurance company pays claims) or self-insured (employer pays claims from general assets). STD denials should be appealed immediately as the short benefit period means time is critical.
State-mandated insurance providing benefits for work-related injuries and occupational diseases. Exclusive remedy for workplace injuries (cannot sue employer in most cases). Benefits include: medical treatment (100% coverage), temporary disability (typically 2/3 of wages during recovery), permanent disability (based on impairment ratings), vocational rehabilitation, and death benefits. Each state has its own workers' comp system with different benefit levels, rating schedules, and procedures. Disputes resolved through state workers' comp boards/commissions, not courts. Independent medical exams (IME) commonly used. Employers/insurers often dispute causation (was injury work-related?), extent of disability, or whether medical treatment is necessary. Not governed by ERISA.
Traditional pensions promising specific monthly benefits at retirement based on salary and years of service. Governed by ERISA. Employer funds the plan and bears investment risk. Benefits typically calculated as: years of service × multiplier (e.g., 1.5%) × average final salary. Vesting typically occurs after 5 years (cliff vesting) or gradually (graded vesting). Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) insures private sector defined benefit plans up to maximum limits ($75,000/year for 65-year-old in single-employer plans as of 2025). When employers terminate underfunded plans, PBGC takes over but benefits may be reduced to PBGC maximums. Common disputes: miscalculated benefits, failure to pay early retirement subsidies, incorrect service credits, missing participants, and QDRO (Qualified Domestic Relations Order) issues in divorce. Lump sum distributions sometimes available but may be actuarially unfavorable.
Defined contribution plans where employees contribute pre-tax salary (traditional) or post-tax (Roth), often with employer matching. Governed by ERISA. Annual contribution limits: $23,000 employee contribution + $7,500 catch-up if age 50+ (2024). Employer match formulas vary (e.g., 50% of first 6% of salary). Vesting schedules for employer contributions: immediate, 3-year cliff, or 2-6 year graded. Employee contributions are always 100% vested. Investment risk borne by employee. Common disputes: excessive plan fees (recordkeeping, investment management), imprudent investment options, employer failure to make promised matching contributions, delays in depositing employee contributions (must be within 7 business days for small plans), and prohibited transactions. Major excessive fee settlements include Lockheed Martin $62M (2022), Boeing $57M (2020), and NYU $6M (2020). 403(b) plans are similar but for nonprofits and public schools.
Federal law providing up to 12 weeks unpaid leave for serious health conditions (employee or immediate family member), childbirth/adoption, or qualifying military exigencies. Also provides 26 weeks military caregiver leave. Eligibility: employed 12 months, worked 1,250 hours in past 12 months, employer has 50+ employees within 75 miles. Employee entitled to return to same or equivalent position with same pay, benefits, and terms. Employer must maintain health insurance during leave. Intermittent leave allowed for chronic conditions. Not governed by ERISA - separate federal statute (29 USC 2601 et seq). Violations include: denying leave, retaliating for taking leave, interfering with rights, refusing to return employee to position, or failing to maintain health insurance. Remedies include: lost wages, liquidated damages (2x back pay for willful violations), reinstatement, front pay if reinstatement not feasible, compensatory damages, and attorney fees. Substantially more favorable remedies than ERISA.
State-mandated paid leave for family and medical reasons. Available in California, New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Washington, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Oregon, Colorado, Delaware, Maryland, and Washington DC (as of 2024). Funding and benefits vary: California provides 60-70% wage replacement for up to 8 weeks (bonding) or 6 weeks (family care); New York provides 67% (increasing to 70%) for up to 12 weeks; New Jersey provides 85% (capped) for up to 12 weeks. Separate from FMLA but often runs concurrently. Not governed by ERISA. Administered by state agencies. Disputes involve eligibility denials, benefit calculation errors, and employer retaliation.
Federal program providing monthly benefits and medical coverage to coal miners totally disabled by pneumoconiosis (black lung disease) and survivors of miners who died from the disease. Administered by Department of Labor. Funded by excise tax on coal. Approximately 25,000 beneficiaries receiving benefits (2024). Benefits: monthly payments varying by number of dependents ($752.90 monthly for miner alone, $1,505.70 with three+ dependents in 2024) plus medical coverage for black lung disease. Claimants must prove: (1) pneumoconiosis; (2) total disability; (3) disability caused by coal mine employment. Presumptions apply if 15+ years coal mine employment. Coal companies vigorously contest claims using company doctors. Appeals to Administrative Law Judge, Benefits Review Board, then federal court.
The VA disability rating system is unique, using ratings from 0% to 100% in 10% increments based on the severity of service-connected conditions. Understanding how ratings are combined, how to prove service connection, and how to maximize your rating is essential for veterans seeking proper compensation.
VA disability ratings from 0% to 100% in 10% increments. Each service-connected condition receives a separate rating based on severity, assigned using the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), a comprehensive manual listing diagnostic codes for thousands of conditions. For example, knee conditions (diagnostic code 5260-5262) can be rated 0% (no limitation of motion), 10% (slight limitation), 20% (moderate limitation), 30% (severe limitation), or higher if ankylosis (fusion) or requiring knee replacement. Combined rating formula: Multiple ratings are not simply added. Instead, VA uses a combined ratings table that accounts for diminishing efficiency. Example: 50% rating + 30% rating does not equal 80%. VA starts with 50%, then applies 30% to the remaining 50% efficiency (30% of 50 = 15), yielding 65% combined. Ratings are rounded to nearest 10% (65% rounds to 70%). Therefore, 50% + 30% = 70% combined rating. This combined ratings table often surprises veterans who expect simple addition.
To receive VA disability compensation, must prove three elements: (1) In-service event or injury - something happened during military service (injury, disease onset, exposure to hazard); (2) Current disability - you currently suffer from a condition diagnosed by medical evidence; (3) Nexus - medical opinion linking the current disability to the in-service event. Nexus opinions typically state condition is "at least as likely as not" (50%+ probability) caused or aggravated by military service. Private medical opinions (independent medical examinations, IME) are often more favorable than VA C&P (Compensation & Pension) examinations. Some conditions have presumptive service connection (discussed below), relaxing nexus requirement.
Certain conditions are legally presumed service-connected if veteran served in specified locations or time periods, without need to prove nexus. Agent Orange presumptive conditions (Vietnam veterans 1962-1975, Thailand veterans, Korean DMZ veterans, C-123 aircraft crew): Type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease, Parkinson's disease, various cancers (prostate, lung, bladder, etc.), peripheral neuropathy. PACT Act 2022 presumptive conditions (burn pit and toxic exposure - Iraq, Afghanistan, Gulf War veterans): 23+ respiratory conditions including asthma, rhinitis, sinusitis, and various cancers. Gulf War Syndrome: Chronic multisymptom illnesses (chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, functional gastrointestinal disorders) presumed service-connected for Gulf War veterans. Camp Lejeune toxic water exposure (1953-1987): Eight conditions including cancers, Parkinson's, and others. Radiation exposure: Various cancers. Presumptive service connection dramatically increases approval rates as VA cannot require nexus proof.
Allows veteran to receive 100% disability compensation even if combined rating is less than 100%. Two types: (1) Schedular TDIU - requires one condition rated 60%+ or multiple conditions with combined rating 70%+ (with at least one condition 40%+); (2) Extraschedular TDIU - for veterans not meeting schedular criteria but whose service-connected disabilities prevent substantially gainful employment. Veteran must prove inability to obtain/maintain substantially gainful employment (2024: income not exceeding poverty threshold for one person, approximately $15,060). Marginal employment (odd jobs, minimal income) does not disqualify. TDIU provides monthly compensation at 100% rate ($3,737.85 for veteran alone in 2024) while maintaining lower percentage rating. TDIU recipients can work in sheltered/protected environments or have brief attempts at employment without automatic loss of TDIU. VA may schedule re-examinations to determine if veteran has recovered ability to work.
A condition caused or aggravated by a service-connected condition can itself become service-connected, even if the secondary condition did not arise in service. Example: Service-connected knee injury causes compensatory gait, leading to lower back problems. Back condition becomes secondary service-connected. Example: Service-connected PTSD causes depression. Depression becomes secondary service-connected. Must prove: (1) service-connected primary condition, (2) current secondary condition, and (3) nexus (medical opinion that secondary condition was caused or aggravated by primary condition). Secondary conditions are rated separately and increase combined rating. Common secondary claims: Mental health conditions (depression, anxiety) secondary to chronic pain conditions. Back/hip problems secondary to knee/ankle injuries (altered gait). Sleep apnea secondary to PTSD or rhinitis (deviated septum). Migraines secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI). Erectile dysfunction secondary to diabetes or PTSD.
Additional compensation beyond standard disability rates for veterans with especially severe disabilities. Categories include: SMC(k) - loss or loss of use of one hand, one foot, or blindness in one eye; SMC(l) - loss or loss of use of both feet, both hands, one foot and one hand, blindness in both eyes, or bedridden; SMC(o) - aid and attendance (A&A) required for activities of daily living; SMC(r) - aid and attendance plus additional disability factors. SMC rates range from additional $128/month (SMC-k) to over $9,000/month (higher SMC levels). Aid and Attendance: Veteran needs assistance with activities of daily living (bathing, dressing, eating, toileting) or is bedridden. Housebound: Veteran substantially confined to home. SMC is in addition to base disability compensation. Example: 100% disabled veteran receiving $3,737.85/month who also qualifies for SMC(o) Aid and Attendance receives additional compensation, totaling approximately $5,400+/month.
2024 VA disability compensation rates (veteran with no dependents): 10% = $171.23/month; 20% = $338.49/month; 30% = $524.31/month; 40% = $755.28/month; 50% = $1,075.16/month; 60% = $1,361.88/month; 70% = $1,716.28/month; 80% = $1,995.01/month; 90% = $2,241.91/month; 100% = $3,737.85/month. Additional compensation for dependents (spouse, children, dependent parents). Tax-free income. Does not offset Social Security disability (can receive both). Veterans with 30%+ rating qualify for additional compensation for dependents. Veterans with 50%+ rating and dependents receive significantly higher monthly compensation.
VA reformed its appeals process in February 2019. When VA issues unfavorable decision, veteran has one year to choose one of three "lanes": (1) Supplemental Claim - submit new and relevant evidence, triggers new review at regional office level (fastest option, typically 4-5 months); (2) Higher-Level Review - senior reviewer at regional office reviews same evidence for errors (no new evidence accepted), typically 4-5 months; (3) Board Appeal - appeal to Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA) with three sub-options: Direct Review (no new evidence, no hearing, fastest Board option), Evidence Submission (can submit new evidence within 90 days), or Hearing (testify before Veterans Law Judge via videoconference or in-person). Board appeals take 1-3 years depending on docket. If Board denies, can appeal to Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC), then Federal Circuit, then Supreme Court. Under AMA, can switch lanes after receiving decision. Old "legacy" appeals system (pre-AMA) had multi-year backlogs (sometimes 5-7 years for Board decision). AMA significantly improved timelines for Supplemental Claims and Higher-Level Reviews.
Statements from fellow service members ("buddy statements") describing in-service events, injuries, or symptoms are competent evidence for proving service connection. VA must consider lay evidence. Particularly valuable when service treatment records are incomplete or missing (common for injuries not requiring hospitalization). Buddy statements should include: declarant's name, contact information, dates of service together, specific observations (not conclusions), and signature under penalty of perjury. Example: "I served with John Smith in Iraq 2004-2005. On November 15, 2004, our convoy hit an IED. I saw Smith thrown from the vehicle and complain of back pain afterward. He was limping for weeks." Lay statements from family members, friends, and the veteran can also describe current symptom severity, functional limitations, and how conditions affect daily life. Lay evidence is often crucial for mental health conditions where fellow service members observed changes in behavior.
ERISA disability claims involve unique procedural rules and limitations that dramatically disadvantage claimants compared to non-ERISA disability claims. Understanding these challenges is essential for effective appeals and litigation strategy.
Most ERISA disability plans are insured by companies like Unum, MetLife, Hartford, Cigna, Liberty Mutual, and Prudential. These insurers both decide whether you are disabled AND pay benefits from their own funds (insurance premiums collected). Obvious conflict: insurer profits by denying claims. Supreme Court in Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Glenn (2008) held this conflict of interest must be weighed as a factor in determining whether a denial was arbitrary and capricious. However, it is only one factor among many, and courts often give it minimal weight. Insurers have powerful financial incentive to deny claims, hire doctors who predictably find claimants capable of work, and interpret policy terms narrowly. Discovery in ERISA cases sometimes reveals internal insurer policies targeting high-value claims for denial, paying bonuses to claims staff who reduce claim payouts, and maintaining "blacklists" of treating physicians whose opinions are automatically discredited.
If the ERISA plan grants the administrator "discretionary authority" to determine eligibility or interpret plan terms (and most do), courts review claim denials under the extremely deferential "arbitrary and capricious" standard. This is the most deferential standard in administrative law. Courts will uphold the denial unless it is "unreasonable" or "without rational basis." Practically, this means courts affirm denials 70-80% of the time under arbitrary and capricious review. Contrast with "de novo" review (no deference to administrator), applied when plans do not grant discretion. Under de novo review, courts independently assess medical evidence and approve/deny approximately 50-50%. Lesson: review your plan document carefully. Some states (California) have banned discretionary clauses in insurance policies issued in the state, forcing de novo review.
ERISA requires plans to provide at least 180 days to appeal health and disability claim denials (some plans provide longer). This deadline is strictly enforced. Missing it typically bars any lawsuit, permanently forfeiting your benefits. Courts rarely grant equitable tolling (extension) absent extraordinary circumstances (e.g., mental incapacity, fraudulent concealment by plan). Calendar the deadline immediately upon receiving denial. If deadline falls on weekend or holiday, typically extended to next business day, but do not rely on this - file early. Send appeal via certified mail, return receipt requested.
District courts reviewing ERISA claim denials typically limit their review to the "administrative record" - documents, medical records, and other evidence submitted during the internal appeals process. Courts generally will not consider evidence you submit for the first time in litigation. This rule dramatically increases the importance of the internal appeal: it is your only opportunity to build the record. You must submit all favorable medical opinions, functional capacity evaluations, treating physician letters, and other evidence during the internal appeal. If you discover critical evidence after exhausting appeals and filing suit, courts rarely allow you to supplement the record. Limited exceptions: (1) evidence showing procedural irregularity in claims process; (2) evidence the plan administrator refused to consider; (3) when administrator relied on new evidence in its decision that you did not have opportunity to rebut. Lesson: treat the internal appeal like trial preparation. Submit overwhelming evidence.
ERISA provides no right to jury trial. District judges decide cases based on administrative record review. This eliminates the sympathy factor that might help disability claimants in jury trials. Judges reviewing hundreds of ERISA cases per year may become jaded or deferential to insurer denials. Conversely, some judges become skeptical of insurers' practices after seeing patterns of questionable denials. No opportunity to present live testimony (in most cases). No opportunity for jury to see how disability affects you. Decision is based on paper record only.
ERISA limits remedies to the benefits denied (past and future monthly benefits owed) and equitable relief. You cannot recover: (1) punitive damages, even if the insurer acted in bad faith; (2) compensatory damages for emotional distress, even if the wrongful denial caused depression, anxiety, financial ruin, or other harms; (3) consequential damages (e.g., home foreclosure, bankruptcy, medical bills incurred because you lacked income). This dramatically reduces case value compared to non-ERISA disability claims (individual policies) where punitive damages in bad faith cases can reach millions. Under ERISA, a $5,000/month LTD claim yielding 10 years of benefits is worth $600,000 maximum (no matter how egregious the denial). Under state bad faith law (non-ERISA), the same claim could yield $600,000 benefits plus $2-5 million punitive damages.
ERISA Section 502(g)(1) provides that courts "in their discretion" may award attorney fees to either party. Unlike some statutes mandating fee awards to prevailing plaintiffs, ERISA fee awards are discretionary. Courts consider five factors: (1) degree of opposing party's culpability or bad faith; (2) ability of opposing party to satisfy fee award; (3) whether fee award would deter others; (4) whether party requesting fees sought to benefit all participants; (5) relative merits of the parties' positions. Even if you win, you may not recover attorney fees. Courts rarely award fees to prevailing defendants (plans). This uncertainty makes some ERISA cases less attractive to attorneys. However, when fees are awarded, they can be substantial (hundreds of thousands of dollars in multi-year cases), and the plan must pay (not the claimant).
You must exhaust the plan's internal appeal process before filing suit. Filing suit prematurely results in dismissal. Exhaustion requirement is strictly enforced. Exception: if the plan fails to follow ERISA's procedural requirements (e.g., fails to provide reasons for denial, misses decision deadlines, refuses to provide claim file), you may be excused from exhaustion or entitled to de novo review. ERISA requires plans to: (1) provide detailed written notice of denial including specific reasons and plan provisions cited; (2) allow at least 180 days to appeal; (3) provide full and fair review; (4) provide access to entire claim file; (5) issue decision within specified timeframes (45 days for disability claims, with possible 30-day extension). Procedural violations can be leveraged to improve standard of review.
Most LTD policies define disability as inability to perform "your own occupation" for first 24 months, then inability to perform "any occupation" thereafter. Insurers hire vocational consultants to identify jobs claimants can allegedly perform. Vocational reports often identify sedentary jobs (sitting 6+ hours, lifting 10 lbs occasionally) or light jobs (sitting/standing/walking 6 hours, lifting 20 lbs occasionally) that claimants supposedly can perform based on transferable skills and residual functional capacity. Fight back by: (1) obtaining treating physician RFC forms specifying limitations more restrictive than sedentary (e.g., can sit only 2 hours, must lie down 3+ hours, can lift only 5 lbs, frequent absences due to medical appointments or symptom exacerbations); (2) hiring your own vocational expert to testify that given your age, education, work experience, and RFC, no jobs exist in significant numbers; (3) challenging insurer's vocational analysis (are listed jobs realistic? do they exist in significant numbers? do they pay "any occupation" threshold income defined in policy?); (4) emphasizing medication side effects (drowsiness, cognitive impairment) that preclude sustained work.
Disability insurers routinely hire private investigators to videotape claimants performing daily activities. Surveillance typically lasts 3-5 days (sometimes longer). Investigators film claimants: grocery shopping, taking out trash, gardening, playing with children, walking dogs, going to gym, etc. Insurers then use edited video clips to argue claimants are capable of working. How to address surveillance: (1) Explain that short bursts of activity filmed do not reflect inability to sustain work 8 hours daily, 5 days weekly. You may "pay the price" for activities with increased pain/fatigue for days afterward (not filmed); (2) Emphasize that taking out trash for 5 minutes does not equal ability to sit at desk 6+ hours, meet deadlines, and maintain consistent attendance; (3) Note that surveillance captures only a few days, not "bad days" when symptoms are severe; (4) Distinguish activities of daily living from work demands (grocery shopping with breaks vs. sustained work pace); (5) Point out that investigators often film from far away, cannot assess pain level, and edit footage to show only favorable moments. In appeals and litigation, always address surveillance evidence directly - ignoring it allows insurer to control narrative.
Unemployment insurance is a joint federal-state program, meaning each state administers its own system with variations in benefit duration, weekly amounts, eligibility requirements, and disqualification rules. Understanding your state's specific rules is critical.
The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) is a powerful federal law providing unpaid job-protected leave for serious health conditions, childbirth, adoption, and military family needs. Unlike ERISA, FMLA allows compensatory and punitive damages, making violations costly for employers. Understanding your FMLA rights and how to recognize violations is critical.
Defined benefit pension plans provide retirement income based on formulas considering salary and years of service. Despite ERISA protections, pension disputes are common due to plan complexity, employer miscalculations, and plan underfunding. Understanding common issues can help retirees identify and rectify errors.
Pension benefits are calculated using formulas specified in plan documents (e.g., 1.5% × years of service × final average compensation). Errors occur when: wrong salary figures are used (failing to include bonuses, overtime, or other compensation included in plan's definition of "compensation"), incorrect service credits (failing to credit certain periods of employment, part-time service, or military service), improper actuarial assumptions in lump sum conversions, or failure to apply early retirement subsidies. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) audits found over $1.2 billion in pension underpayments from 2018-2023. If you suspect miscalculation, request detailed calculation from plan administrator (ERISA requires this), review plan document, and consider hiring pension actuary to review.
Employers and plan administrators are required to locate retirees when benefits become payable. Despite this, thousands of retirees never receive benefits because: they moved and did not update address, plan administrator made insufficient effort to locate them, or records were lost when companies merged or went bankrupt. PBGC maintains Missing Participants Program database searchable at pbgc.gov. Heirs of deceased participants can claim benefits. If you worked for a company with a pension plan but never received benefits, search: PBGC missing participants database, National Registry of Unclaimed Retirement Benefits (unclaimedretirementbenefits.com), contact former employer, check with Pension Rights Center (pensionrights.org). Pension benefits do not expire - you (or heirs) are entitled regardless of how much time passed.
When employers fail to adequately fund pension plans, plans become underfunded. In severe cases, employer may terminate plan (distress termination) or PBGC may involuntarily terminate plan to protect participants. When PBGC takes over plan, benefits are guaranteed up to legal maximum limits ($75,000/year for 65-year-old retiree in single-employer plans, as of 2025; lower for younger retirees). If your accrued benefit exceeds PBGC maximum, you will receive reduced benefit. PBGC maximums are adjusted annually. Multi-employer plans (union plans covering multiple employers) have lower PBGC guarantees. Recent high-profile pension failures include: Sears (PBGC takeover, benefits reduced for some participants), numerous steel and airline company pensions. If your pension plan is underfunded (check annual funding notice), monitor closely and consider taking lump sum if offered (though actuarial value may be reduced).
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation maximum guaranteed benefit (2025): $75,000/year for 65-year-old retiree in single-employer plan. Limits are lower if benefits begin before age 65: Age 62: $66,000/year; Age 60: $52,500/year; Age 55: $33,750/year. Limits are higher if benefits begin after 65 (actuarial adjustment). Multi-employer plan guarantees are much lower (calculated based on years of service × multiplier, typically $100-$150 per month per year of service). PBGC limits can devastate high-income retirees who expected larger benefits. PBGC also does not guarantee: benefits above legal maximum, certain early retirement supplements, benefits attributable to plan amendments made within 5 years of plan termination (phase-in rule), benefits for executives earning over certain limits if plan terminates in bankruptcy. If your plan is at risk of PBGC takeover, consult benefits attorney regarding options.
Some employers converted traditional defined benefit pensions to cash balance plans. Cash balance plans credit employee accounts with "pay credits" (percentage of salary each year) and "interest credits" (fixed or variable interest rate). Conversions caused "wear-away" issues for older workers: employer calculates "opening balance" equal to actuarial value of accrued benefit under old plan, then future accruals are under new cash balance formula. Because opening balance grows only at interest credit rate (e.g., 4%/year) while traditional pension would have accrued at higher rate based on increasing salary and service, older workers saw years where they accrued no additional benefits. IBM cash balance plan litigation was landmark case. Pension Protection Act 2006 added protections, but conversions remain controversial. If your pension was converted to cash balance plan, compare projected benefits under old and new formulas.
Married participants must elect benefit form at retirement. Default for married participants is joint and survivor annuity (reduced benefit during participant's life, continuing benefit to spouse after participant's death, typically 50% or 100% of participant's benefit). To elect single life annuity (higher benefit during life, but nothing to spouse after death), spouse must consent in writing. Disputes arise when: plan fails to obtain spousal consent, participant forges spouse's signature, spouse claims was coerced, or plan miscalculates survivor benefit. Surviving spouses who discover deceased spouse elected single life annuity without proper consent can challenge election and claim survivor benefits. ERISA requires spousal consent to be in writing, witnessed by plan representative or notary, and spouse must receive explanation of financial effect.
When divorcing, retirement benefits are often divided via Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO), a court order directing plan to pay portion of participant's benefits to alternate payee (former spouse). QDROs are complex and must satisfy ERISA requirements to be "qualified." Common QDRO issues: order does not meet plan's QDRO procedures (rejected by plan), order is ambiguous about benefit calculation, order attempts to require plan to provide benefit form not otherwise available, former spouse dies before benefits begin, or timing issues (when alternate payee can receive benefits). Each plan has model QDRO form and procedures. QDRO attorney or specialized QDRO drafting service is essential. Do not rely on divorce attorney unfamiliar with ERISA. Incorrect QDRO can result in former spouse receiving nothing or participant paying more than required.
Many traditional pension plans offer early retirement subsidies - unreduced or partially reduced benefits if participant retires before normal retirement age (typically 65) with certain age and service combinations (e.g., age 55 with 30 years of service = unreduced benefit). Early retirement subsidies are valuable (can be worth hundreds of thousands of dollars). Disputes arise when plan administrator denies subsidy, claiming participant did not meet requirements, or fails to reflect subsidy in lump sum calculation. ERISA requires lump sums to reflect subsidies participant is entitled to as of lump sum date. If offered lump sum, review calculation carefully for early retirement subsidy. Some plans eliminated early retirement subsidies for future accruals (but must preserve subsidies already earned).
The remedies available in benefits disputes vary dramatically depending on which law governs the claim (ERISA, FMLA, state insurance law, Social Security Act, etc.). Understanding potential recovery helps assess case value and litigation strategy.
Medical evidence is the single most important factor in disability claims (Social Security, VA, LTD, STD, workers' compensation). Understanding what evidence is most persuasive and how to obtain it is crucial for approval.
Opinions from your treating physicians (doctors who have treated you over time and have longitudinal knowledge of your conditions) are given the most weight. Treating source opinions are more credible than one-time consultative examinations or file reviews by insurer-hired doctors. Key: Obtain detailed letters from treating physicians explaining: (1) your diagnoses and objective clinical findings (exam findings, test results); (2) treatment history and your response; (3) your functional limitations in detail (see RFC forms below); (4) why you are unable to work full-time; (5) expected duration of disability; (6) medication side effects. Generic letters ("patient is disabled") carry little weight. Specific functional assessments are critical. For Social Security, treating physician opinions are evaluated under regulatory factors (supportability - how well-supported by medical evidence; consistency - with other evidence; relationship - length/frequency of treatment; specialization). For ERISA LTD, insurers sometimes dismiss treating physicians as "advocates" for patients (biased), but courts recognize treating physicians' superior knowledge.
Residual Functional Capacity (RFC) forms are questionnaires completed by physicians specifying your functional limitations. For physical conditions, RFC forms ask: How long can patient sit/stand/walk in 8-hour workday? How much can patient lift/carry (frequently and occasionally)? Limitations on reaching, handling, fingering? Limitations on climbing, balancing, stooping, kneeling, crouching, crawling? Environmental restrictions (avoid heights, hazards, temperature extremes, dust/fumes)? How many days per month would symptoms cause absences? Need for unscheduled breaks? For mental conditions, mental RFC forms ask: Limitations on understanding/remembering instructions? Limitations on sustained concentration/persistence/pace? Limitations on social interaction? Limitations on adaptation to changes? How many days per month would symptoms cause absences? Specific limitations are critical. "Moderate limitation" is vague. "Can sit 2 hours total in 8-hour day, must lie down 3+ hours, will miss 4+ days/month due to symptom exacerbations" is specific and powerful. RFC forms are often determinative. If RFC is limited to sedentary work (sit 6 hours, stand/walk 2 hours, lift 10 lbs occasionally) and you are over age 50, Social Security Grid Rules may direct a finding of disabled. Downloadable RFC forms are available online.
Objective medical evidence - diagnostic test results showing abnormalities - is critical for credibility. Examples: MRI showing herniated discs, spinal stenosis, nerve impingement. CT scan showing brain injury, tumors, organ damage. X-rays showing arthritis, fractures, bone spurs. EMG/Nerve conduction studies showing neuropathy, radiculopathy, carpal tunnel. EEG showing seizure activity. Cardiac tests (echocardiogram, stress test, angiography) showing heart disease. Pulmonary function tests showing respiratory impairment. Bloodwork showing anemia, organ dysfunction, inflammatory markers. Neuropsychological testing showing cognitive deficits. Mental status exams documenting psychiatric symptoms. Subjective complaints alone ("I have pain") are less persuasive. Objective findings corroborating complaints are powerful. Note: Some disabling conditions lack objective findings (fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, migraines, mental health conditions). For these, detailed symptom descriptions, consistent treatment, and treating physician support are crucial.
For psychiatric disabilities (depression, anxiety, PTSD, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia), detailed mental health evaluations are essential. Types of evidence: Psychiatrist and psychologist treatment notes documenting symptoms, mental status exams (appearance, mood, affect, thought process, thought content, cognition, insight, judgment). Frequency and duration of treatment (seeing psychiatrist monthly for 2 years is more persuasive than one-time evaluation). Neuropsychological testing - objective testing measuring cognitive functioning, memory, attention, processing speed, executive functioning. Particularly valuable for proving cognitive limitations. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores - though Social Security eliminated GAF scores in 2013, scores in older records and from private evaluations can show symptom severity (0-100 scale, lower scores indicate greater impairment; score below 50 indicates serious symptoms). Mental RFC forms from treating psychiatrist/psychologist specifying limitations on concentration, pace, social interaction, adaptation. Hospitalizations and emergency room visits for psychiatric crises. Medication lists - multiple psychiatric medications at high doses suggest severity. Side effects of psychiatric medications (drowsiness, cognitive dulling, tremors, weight gain). Challenges: Mental health conditions are subjective and easier for insurers to deny. Claimants are often accused of malingering. Consistent treatment over time and objective testing are critical.
Social Security Administration and VA often order consultative examinations (CE) or Compensation & Pension (C&P) exams when your medical records are insufficient or need clarification. CE/C&P exams are one-time examinations by doctors contracted by SSA/VA. Examiners range from thorough and fair to cursory and biased. Tips for CE/C&P exams: (1) Attend the exam - failure to attend without good cause can result in denial; (2) Be honest and detailed - describe your worst days, not best days. Do not minimize symptoms; (3) Describe functional limitations - explain how conditions affect daily activities, not just diagnoses; (4) Bring medication list, medical records, assistive devices (cane, brace, etc.); (5) If examiner asks you to perform activities (lift weight, range of motion tests), try your best but explain limitations/pain; (6) Request copy of exam report and review carefully. If inaccurate or incomplete, submit rebuttal letter to SSA/VA with appeal; (7) Treating physician opinions trump CE opinions - if CE report contradicts treating physicians, emphasize treating physicians' superior knowledge; (8) Some CE doctors are known for writing unfavorable reports (effectively hired guns for SSA/VA). If report is clearly biased or unsupported, challenge it vigorously.
List all medications you take, including prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, and supplements. Medication lists demonstrate: (1) severity of conditions - multiple medications for same condition suggests severity; high doses suggest severity; (2) types of conditions - narcotic pain medications, antidepressants, antipsychotics, anti-seizure medications, chemotherapy, immunosuppressants, insulin, cardiac medications all indicate serious conditions; (3) side effects affecting ability to work - drowsiness, dizziness, cognitive impairment (brain fog), nausea, diarrhea, tremors, weight gain, fatigue. Side effects can be as disabling as the underlying condition. Example: Narcotic pain medications (opioids) cause drowsiness and impaired concentration, incompatible with most work. Obtain detailed side effects statements from prescribing physicians. Pharmacy printouts showing medication lists and dates prescribed are helpful evidence. If you stopped medications due to intolerable side effects or lack of efficacy, document that.
Consistent, ongoing treatment strengthens disability claims. Treatment history shows: (1) severity - frequent doctor visits, physical therapy, pain management, injections, surgeries suggest severe conditions; (2) persistence - treatment over months/years shows condition is long-lasting, not temporary; (3) compliance - following prescribed treatment shows you are genuinely trying to improve (not malingering). Gaps in treatment are problematic. Insurers and SSA often argue "if you were really disabled, you would be seeing doctors regularly." Address treatment gaps if they exist: lack of insurance/inability to afford treatment, doctor told you nothing more could be done, condition is chronic/stable (doesn't require frequent visits), medication manages symptoms adequately. Treatment compliance: Insurers sometimes deny claims arguing you are non-compliant with treatment (missed appointments, didn't follow recommendations, didn't take medications). If you missed appointments, explain why (couldn't afford, transportation issues, symptoms too severe to leave home). If you refused recommended treatment (e.g., surgery), explain (doctor said risks outweigh benefits, you are not surgical candidate, religious beliefs, etc.).
Functional evidence - how your conditions affect daily life - is critical, especially for conditions without strong objective findings. Provide detailed descriptions: What is a typical day like? How long can you sit/stand/walk before needing to rest? How far can you walk? Can you climb stairs? How is your sleep (frequent waking, insomnia, pain interrupting sleep)? Do you need help with activities of daily living (bathing, dressing, preparing meals, shopping, cleaning, laundry)? Do you use assistive devices (cane, walker, wheelchair, shower chair, grab bars, reaching tools)? How often do you leave home? Do you drive (or unable to drive due to medications, vision, cognitive issues)? Can you do household chores (or spouse/family does everything)? Can you concentrate to read, watch TV, manage finances? Social limitations - do you avoid social activities, have difficulty getting along with others, experience anxiety in public? Hobbies - what activities have you stopped due to disability? Function reports (SSA Form SSA-3373 for adults, SSA-3380 for children) are submitted with initial applications. Third-party function reports from family members, friends, and caregivers corroborate your limitations. For mental health claims, describe: difficulty concentrating, memory problems, anxiety/panic attacks, suicidal thoughts, isolating behaviors, inability to handle stress or changes in routine.
Vocational evidence addresses whether you can perform any work despite limitations. For Social Security, vocational experts (VEs) testify at ALJ hearings about whether jobs exist that you can perform given your age, education, work experience, and RFC. Medical-Vocational Guidelines (Grid Rules) direct findings for certain combinations of age, education, prior work, and RFC (e.g., over age 55, limited education, prior medium or heavy work, limited to sedentary RFC = disabled). For ERISA LTD claims, insurers hire vocational consultants to identify jobs you can allegedly perform (typically sedentary or light jobs if you have physical limitations). Counter with: (1) Treating physician RFC showing limitations more restrictive than sedentary (e.g., can sit only 2 hours, need to lie down); (2) Your own vocational expert report showing no jobs exist given your limitations, age, education, and work experience; (3) Arguments that identified jobs require skills you lack, are not realistic (theoretical jobs that don't exist in meaningful numbers), or pay below "any occupation" threshold in policy. Transferable skills: If prior work was skilled, insurer may argue you have transferable skills (can perform other jobs using those skills). Age is important: if over 50, transferable skills are more limited (per Social Security regulations). If over 55, directly transferable skills must exist (very similar job) or you are considered disabled under Grid Rules (if limited to sedentary work).
Navigating benefits claims requires understanding the specific procedural steps, documentation requirements, deadlines, and appeal processes for each type of benefit. Here is a comprehensive 12-step process applicable to most benefits disputes, with variations noted.
First, identify what type of benefit you are claiming and which law governs. This determines procedures, deadlines, and remedies. Is it: Social Security Disability (SSDI or SSI) - federal program, administered by SSA, unique 5-level appeal process. VA disability - federal program for veterans, administered by VA, Appeals Modernization Act procedures. ERISA disability (LTD/STD through employer) - federal ERISA law, 180-day appeal deadline, limited remedies. Private disability insurance (individual policy) - state insurance law, not ERISA, better remedies. Unemployment insurance - state program, varies by state, appeals to state agency then state court. Pension/401k dispute - ERISA governs, federal court jurisdiction. PTO/vacation pay - state wage law, not ERISA, state court or state labor department. FMLA leave - federal law, not ERISA, generous remedies. State paid family leave - state-administered, varies by state. Workers' compensation - state-specific, workers' comp commission/board. Correctly identifying governing law is crucial.
Before filing, gather: Medical records - all treatment records, diagnostic tests (MRI, CT, X-ray, bloodwork), hospital records, psychiatric records, physical therapy notes. Doctor contact information - names, addresses, phone numbers of all treating physicians. Medication list - all current medications, dosages, prescribing doctors. Work history - detailed job descriptions, physical/mental demands of jobs, dates of employment, employers' names and addresses. Earnings records - W-2s, pay stubs, tax returns (for calculating benefit amounts). Insurance policies - disability policy, health insurance card, plan documents (for ERISA claims). Personnel file - if claiming wrongful termination or FMLA violation, request complete personnel file from employer (some states require employer to provide). Denial letters - if benefit was already denied, the denial letter is critical (contains reasons for denial and appeal deadline). Functional limitations documentation - daily activity logs, statements from family members. Organize chronologically in binders or digital files. This documentation is foundation of your claim.
File claim using method specified by program: Social Security Disability - apply online at ssa.gov, by phone 1-800-772-1213, or in person at local Social Security office. Apply for both SSDI and SSI if you may qualify for both. VA disability - file online at va.gov (recommended), by mail (VA Form 21-526EZ), or in person at regional office. ERISA LTD/STD - file claim with plan administrator (contact HR for forms and procedures). Private disability insurance - contact insurance company, complete claim forms, authorize medical records release. Unemployment - file online through state unemployment website (each state has its own system). File promptly when you become unemployed. Pension/401k disputes - if benefit is denied or miscalculated, file written claim with plan administrator under ERISA claims procedure. PTO/vacation pay - demand payment in writing from employer; if denied, file wage claim with state labor department or sue in state court. FMLA - notify employer of need for leave (verbal or written), request leave, complete employer's FMLA forms. Retain copies of all forms submitted and confirmation of submission (certified mail, online submission confirmation, etc.).
After filing, you will receive requests for additional information: Social Security - SSA will send forms asking for details about conditions, daily activities, work history. Complete and return within deadlines (typically 10-20 days). SSA will request medical records from your doctors (you signed authorization). Follow up to ensure doctors sent records. VA - VA will schedule C&P (Compensation & Pension) examination. Attend exam. VA will request service treatment records and personnel records (if not already in file). Ensure VA has all relevant service records. ERISA disability - insurer will request authorization to obtain medical records, may require you to complete activities questionnaire and attend Independent Medical Examination (IME). Cooperate (within reason) but understand IME doctor is hired by insurer. Unemployment - state may request documentation of earnings, reason for separation from employment, work search log. Submit promptly. Missing deadlines can result in denial. Calendar all deadlines and respond early. Send responses via certified mail (proof of mailing). Keep copies of everything submitted.
Various benefit programs require claimants to attend examinations: Social Security Consultative Examination (CE) - if your medical records are insufficient, SSA will schedule exam with contracted doctor. Failure to attend without good cause can result in denial. Attend exam, be honest about symptoms, describe functional limitations. VA C&P Exam - VA schedules examination by VA-contracted doctor or VA medical center. Exam evaluates severity of claimed conditions. Attend and provide detailed symptom descriptions. Bring buddy statements and medical records if possible. ERISA LTD Independent Medical Examination (IME) - insurer may require you to see doctor chosen by insurer. Failure to attend can result in denial or termination of benefits. Understand that IME doctor is hired by insurer and tends to write favorable-to-insurer opinions. Be honest but emphasize limitations. You can bring someone with you to observe/take notes. Consider obtaining your own independent medical exam to counter IME. Workers' Comp IME - similar to ERISA IME. Tips for exams: Arrive on time. Bring list of medications, medical records, and assistive devices. Describe how you feel on worst days, not best days. Do not minimize symptoms trying to appear stoic. If examiner asks you to perform physical tests, try your best but explain pain/limitations. After exam, obtain copy of report and review for inaccuracies. Submit rebuttal if report is inaccurate or incomplete.
If your claim is denied, the denial letter is critical. Read it thoroughly, multiple times. The letter should contain: Specific reasons for denial - exactly why the claim was denied (insufficient medical evidence, you can perform sedentary work, condition not severe enough, procedural defect, etc.). Plan or policy provisions cited - specific sections of plan/policy supporting denial. Description of additional material needed - if denial is based on insufficient information, what additional evidence is required. Right to appeal and deadline - typically 180 days for ERISA claims, 60 days for Social Security reconsideration, 1 year for VA supplemental claim. Right to review claim file - ERISA requires plans to provide access to all documents relevant to claim. Contact information for appeals. If denial letter does not contain required elements, the denial may be procedurally defective, which can help your appeal. Identify each specific reason for denial - your appeal must address each reason. If denial letter is unclear or you do not understand reasons, consult attorney immediately. Missing appeal deadline can permanently forfeit benefits.
File appeal within deadline specified in denial letter. Deadlines are strictly enforced: ERISA claims - typically 180 days from denial (some health claims have 180 days, disability claims may vary by plan - check plan document). File written appeal letter via certified mail, return receipt requested, before deadline. Social Security - 60 days from denial (plus 5 days for mail). File reconsideration appeal online, by phone, by mail, or in person. Calendar deadline immediately. VA - 1 year from decision to file supplemental claim (submit new evidence), higher-level review (no new evidence), or Board appeal. Choose lane carefully. Unemployment - typically 10-30 days from denial (varies by state). File appeal to state appeals board/tribunal. Check state-specific deadlines. State employment law claims (PTO, wrongful termination) - typically 2-3 years statute of limitations, but some states require filing administrative claim first (e.g., California Labor Commissioner) within shorter period. Even if you plan to hire attorney, file appeal immediately to preserve deadline. You can supplement appeal later, but missing the deadline is often irreversible.
Benefits cases are complex and representation significantly increases success rates. When to hire attorney: Social Security Disability - representation is not required but strongly recommended, especially at ALJ hearing level. Attorneys typically work on contingency (25% of past-due benefits, capped at $7,200 for administrative level). National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives (NOSSCR) has attorney directory. VA disability - Veterans Service Organizations (VSOs) like DAV, American Legion, VFW provide free representation. Private VA-accredited attorneys also available (often on contingency). ERISA LTD denials - hire ERISA attorney immediately after denial. ERISA cases are procedurally complex and administrative record rule means appeal is critical. Many ERISA attorneys offer free consultations and work on contingency or hybrid fee arrangements. FMLA violations - employment attorneys typically work on contingency or hourly. Many offer free consultations. Unemployment appeals - may handle yourself at first level (state appeals hearing), but if denied and appealing to state court, consider attorney. Free or low-cost legal aid: Legal aid organizations provide free representation to low-income individuals. Each state has legal aid programs. Disability Rights organizations provide representation for disability benefits. Law school clinics sometimes handle benefits cases. Benefits attorneys are specialists - do not hire general practice attorney unfamiliar with Social Security, ERISA, or VA law. Check attorney's experience and track record.
Your appeal must address each specific reason for denial with additional evidence: If denied for insufficient medical evidence - obtain updated opinions from treating physicians with detailed RFC forms, new diagnostic tests showing worsening condition, specialist consultations, functional capacity evaluation. If denied because "you can perform sedentary work" - obtain treating physician opinion that you cannot sit 6+ hours, need frequent breaks to lie down, will miss work frequently, have medication side effects preventing sustained concentration. If denied because insurer's IME found you capable of work - obtain your own independent medical examination contradicting IME, treating physician letter explaining why IME opinion is wrong (IME doctor spent 30 minutes vs. treating doctor's years of treatment, IME doctor did not review complete records, IME doctor has financial incentive). If denied for procedural reasons (missed deadline, incomplete forms) - explain why deadline was missed (hospitalization, mental health crisis, etc.) and request waiver. Submit complete information. If VA denied for lack of nexus - obtain private medical opinion (nexus letter) from doctor stating condition is "at least as likely as not" caused by service, submit buddy statements, submit medical literature supporting causation. Strategy: Over-document. Submit overwhelming evidence. For ERISA appeals, remember this is your only chance to build administrative record - courts will not consider evidence you submit later. Include detailed appeal letter (often 10-30 pages) addressing each denial reason, citing medical evidence, referencing plan provisions supporting coverage, distinguishing adverse cases, and arguing applicable legal standards. Consider hiring medical expert or vocational expert to review file and provide opinion.
Some benefit appeals include hearings: Social Security ALJ Hearing - Most important appeal level. Hearing conducted by Administrative Law Judge, typically via videoconference (or in-person if requested). Hearing lasts 30-60 minutes. You testify about conditions, limitations, daily activities, work history, and how conditions affect ability to work. Medical expert may testify about severity of conditions. Vocational expert testifies about jobs you could perform given limitations. Preparation: Review your file (obtain copy from SSA), review testimony questions attorney will ask, prepare to describe worst days, practice testimony, submit all updated medical records at least 5 business days before hearing. Unemployment hearing - Conducted by Administrative Law Judge or referee, typically via telephone or videoconference (some states in-person). You testify about reason for job loss or eligibility issues. Employer representative may testify. Bring documents supporting your testimony. Hearing is recorded. Decision issued weeks later. VA Board Hearing - If you chose Board Appeal with Hearing option, you testify before Veterans Law Judge via videoconference or at regional office. Hearing is recorded. You can submit new evidence. VSO representative typically assists. ERISA claims - typically no hearing during internal appeals (written submissions only). Hearing occurs only if you sue in federal court, and even then it is judge (not jury) deciding based on administrative record. State employment hearings - For wrongful termination, FMLA, or discrimination claims, state or federal court trials involve live testimony, cross-examination, and juries (if requested). Hearing preparation is critical. Practice testimony. Anticipate cross-examination questions. Submit all favorable documents. Consider bringing witnesses (treating doctors rarely testify live but can submit declarations).
Hearing testimony tips: Arrive early (or log in early for virtual hearings). Test technology beforehand. Dress professionally (even for video hearings - judge can see you). Be respectful - address judge as "Your Honor" or "Judge." Tell the truth - credibility is critical. Do not exaggerate but do not minimize. Describe worst days and how conditions affect you. Be specific - instead of "I have pain," say "I have constant burning pain in lower back radiating down left leg, rated 7-8 out of 10, worse with sitting/standing, partially relieved by lying down and medication." Explain functional limitations - "I can sit 15-20 minutes before pain forces me to stand; I can stand 10 minutes before needing to sit; I lie down 3+ hours during the day." Describe medication side effects - "Narcotic pain medication makes me drowsy and foggy; I have difficulty concentrating." Explain why you cannot work - "I cannot sit 8 hours; I would miss 4+ days/month due to severe symptom days; medication side effects prevent sustained concentration." Do not argue with judge or opposing attorney. Answer questions directly. If you do not understand question, ask for clarification. If you do not know the answer, say "I don't know." Pause before answering to give attorney time to object if necessary. After hearing, judge may issue decision immediately (rare) or take weeks/months to issue written decision.
If your appeal is denied, determine next steps: Social Security - If ALJ denies, file Appeals Council review within 60 days. If Appeals Council denies review, file federal district court lawsuit within 60 days. At district court, case is decided based on administrative record (no new evidence). Standard is whether ALJ decision is supported by substantial evidence. If district court denies, can appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals, then (rarely) U.S. Supreme Court. Process can take 4-6 years total. VA - If supplemental claim or higher-level review denies, can file Board appeal. If Board denies, can appeal to Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) within 120 days. If CAVC denies, can appeal to Federal Circuit, then Supreme Court. ERISA - If internal appeal is denied, you can sue in federal district court within plan's limitations period (typically 3 years). Court reviews administrative record under arbitrary and capricious or de novo standard. No jury. If district court denies, appeal to Circuit Court of Appeals. Unemployment - If state appeals board denies, appeal to state court (typically within 30 days). State court reviews for substantial evidence or errors of law. FMLA/employment claims - If informal resolution fails, file lawsuit in state or federal court. FMLA claims can be filed directly (no exhaustion requirement). At each level, consult with attorney about likelihood of success and costs/benefits of further appeals. Sometimes settlement is best option. Insurers may offer settlement after internal appeal denial (lump sum less than full benefits, but guaranteed and immediate). Weigh settlement vs. litigation based on strength of case, financial needs, and litigation risks. Never accept settlement without consulting attorney - you may be waiving valuable rights.
Benefits litigation has resulted in numerous landmark cases establishing important legal principles and multi-million dollar settlements holding employers and insurers accountable. Understanding major cases helps contextualize your own benefits dispute and demonstrates the significant recoveries possible.
Landmark Supreme Court case addressing ERISA conflict of interest. Wanda Glenn's long-term disability claim was denied by MetLife, which both decided her claim and paid benefits from its own funds. Supreme Court held that this structural conflict of interest (insurer profits by denying claims) must be weighed as a factor in determining whether a denial was arbitrary and capricious. However, Court did not specify how much weight the conflict should receive, leaving uncertainty. Lower courts have varied widely in how much weight they give the conflict. Significance: Established that conflict of interest is relevant, but did not fundamentally change deferential standard of review. Most post-Glenn cases still result in affirmance of denials under arbitrary and capricious review.
In the early 2000s, state insurance regulators investigated UnumProvident (now Unum Group) for systematic denial of valid disability claims to boost profits. Multi-state task force found: Unum imposed claim quotas and paid bonuses to staff who reduced claim payments; Unum used biased medical consultants who routinely found claimants capable of work; Unum targeted high-value claims for termination; internal documents referred to claimants as "the enemy." Settlement: Unum agreed to reassess thousands of claims, pay over $1 billion in previously denied claims, and reform claims practices. California, Tennessee, Massachusetts, and Maine regulatory actions resulted in additional settlements. Significance: Largest disability insurance enforcement action in U.S. history. Exposed systematic bad faith practices. Many previously denied claimants received substantial lump sum payments (some $100,000+).
Class action settlement resolving claims that Nationwide Life Insurance Company systematically underpaid or denied disability benefits. Allegations: Nationwide used biased vocational consultants who identified theoretical "any occupation" jobs claimants could allegedly perform, ignoring real-world job availability; Nationwide failed to properly investigate claims and ignored treating physician opinions. Settlement: $345 million to class members (approximately 14,000 claimants). Claims were reassessed and many received additional benefits. Average recovery approximately $25,000, with some claimants receiving over $100,000. Significance: Demonstrated vulnerability of "any occupation" denials based on questionable vocational analysis.
Settlement resolving multi-state regulatory investigation into CIGNA's (now Cigna) disability claims practices. Allegations: CIGNA systematically terminated long-term disability benefits when claimants transitioned from "own occupation" to "any occupation" definition (typically at 24 months of disability); CIGNA used biased medical and vocational consultants; CIGNA ignored treating physician opinions. Settlement: $35 million fund to reassess claims. Thousands of previously terminated claimants had claims reopened. Significance: Highlighted vulnerability of transition from "own occupation" to "any occupation" disability definitions.
Class action settlement resolving claims that Hartford Life Insurance Company systematically denied disability benefits. Allegations: Hartford failed to conduct reasonable investigations, ignored treating physician opinions, and relied on file-review medical consultants who never examined claimants. Settlement: $13.5 million to class members. Claims were reassessed. Significance: Another example of insurer systematic denial practices.
Settlement resolving claims that Liberty Mutual Insurance systematically denied long-term disability claims. Allegations: Liberty Mutual used biased Independent Medical Examiners (IME) who predictably found claimants capable of work; Liberty Mutual ignored treating physicians; Liberty Mutual conducted surveillance and used edited video clips out of context. Settlement: $11 million to class members. Significance: Highlighted issues with insurer surveillance practices and use of IME doctors.
The Social Security disability system has faced a chronic backlog of pending ALJ hearing requests for decades. At peak in 2016, over 1.1 million hearing requests were pending, with average wait times exceeding 600 days (nearly 2 years). By 2024, backlog reduced to approximately 500,000-600,000 but wait times still exceed 12 months in many offices. Crisis caused by: increased applications, insufficient ALJs, outdated technology, and budget constraints. Impact: Claimants wait years for hearings while disabled and without income. Some die while waiting (approximately 10,000+ per year). Congressional hearings and bipartisan legislation have provided additional funding, but backlogs persist. Significance: Demonstrates systemic failure to timely adjudicate disability claims. Advocacy groups like NOSSCR continue pushing for reforms and increased funding.
VA disability benefits system experienced massive backlog in 2010s, with over 600,000 pending claims in 2013, including over 400,000 pending more than 125 days. Claimants waited 1-2+ years for decisions. Crisis caused by: influx of claims from Iraq/Afghanistan veterans, Agent Orange presumptive conditions expansions, complex paper-based system. VA response: Digitized records, hired additional staff, implemented new processing systems, and reformed appeals system (Appeals Modernization Act 2019). By 2024, backlog reduced to under 200,000 pending claims and average processing time under 150 days. However, appeals backlog remains significant (Board of Veterans Appeals has approximately 200,000+ pending appeals). Significance: Demonstrated need for systemic reforms. AMA has improved timelines for supplemental claims and higher-level reviews.
Vietnam veterans exposed to Agent Orange (herbicide containing dioxin) suffered numerous health conditions decades after service. VA initially denied service connection, requiring veterans to prove causation. After decades of litigation, advocacy, and scientific studies, VA established presumptive service connection for numerous conditions: Type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease, Parkinson's disease, various cancers (prostate, lung, bladder, chronic B-cell leukemia, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, soft tissue sarcoma, respiratory cancers), peripheral neuropathy, AL amyloidosis, chloracne. Presumptions expanded over time (most recently in 2021-2023 adding bladder cancer, hypothyroidism, and MGUS). Significance: Hundreds of thousands of Vietnam veterans now receive disability compensation who previously were denied. Demonstrates importance of presumptive service connection for toxic exposures. Established precedent for future toxic exposure claims (burn pits, Camp Lejeune).
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Marine Corps base had contaminated drinking water from 1953-1987 containing toxic chemicals (TCE, PCE, benzene, vinyl chloride). Hundreds of thousands of service members, families, and civilian employees were exposed. Contamination caused cancers, neurological diseases, birth defects, and other conditions. Prior to 2022, victims could not sue federal government due to sovereign immunity. Camp Lejeune Justice Act (part of PACT Act, August 2022) created exception to sovereign immunity, allowing victims to sue. As of 2024, over 200,000 claims filed seeking over $6.1 billion in damages. Cases are pending in U.S. District Court for Eastern District of North Carolina. Eight conditions have presumptive service connection for VA disability: kidney cancer, liver cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, bladder cancer, multiple myeloma, leukemia, Parkinson's disease, and aplastic anemia. Significance: Largest mass tort involving military toxic exposure. Demonstrates long-term health impacts of toxic exposures and importance of accountability.
Veterans who served in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other post-9/11 locations were exposed to toxic burn pits (open-air burning of waste including plastics, chemicals, medical waste, etc.). Veterans reported respiratory illnesses, cancers, and other conditions. VA historically denied most burn pit claims for lack of service connection. PACT Act (Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act, August 2022) established presumptive service connection for 23+ respiratory and other conditions related to burn pit exposure for veterans who served in specified locations (Iraq, Afghanistan, Gulf War, etc.). Conditions include: asthma, chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic rhinitis, chronic sinusitis, constrictive bronchiolitis, granulomatous disease, interstitial lung disease, pleuritis, pulmonary fibrosis, sarcoidosis, various cancers (brain, gastrointestinal, glioblastoma, head/neck, kidney, lymphoma, melanoma, pancreatic, reproductive, respiratory), and others. Over 1 million veterans potentially affected. VA has processed hundreds of thousands of PACT Act claims, with total claims expected to reach several million over coming years. Estimated cost: $280+ billion over 10 years. Significance: Largest expansion of VA benefits in history. Finally provides presumptive service connection for post-9/11 toxic exposures similar to Agent Orange presumptions for Vietnam veterans.
Federal Black Lung Benefits Act provides monthly benefits and medical coverage to coal miners totally disabled by pneumoconiosis (black lung disease). Despite the program, many miners face denial of claims by coal companies and their insurers. Coal companies hire doctors who predictably diagnose "smoking-related disease" rather than coal mine dust exposure. Administrative Law Judge hearings are adversarial, with coal companies aggressively contesting claims. Approval rates vary by ALJ (some approve 10%, others 70%). Recent reforms: 2020 rule changes strengthened claimant protections, limited use of company doctors who never examined miners, and recognized that physicians with financial ties to coal industry are biased. Black Lung Clinics provide medical evaluations and legal assistance to miners. Significance: Demonstrates industry efforts to deny occupational disease claims and importance of medical evidence from non-conflicted physicians.
PBGC audits from 2018-2023 identified over $1.2 billion in pension underpayments to approximately 130,000 retirees across multiple failed pension plans. Errors included: miscalculations of benefits, use of incorrect actuarial assumptions, failure to pay early retirement subsidies, failure to locate missing participants, and data entry errors. PBGC has corrected errors and paid retroactive benefits plus interest. Average correction: approximately $9,200 per retiree, though some received over $100,000. Significance: Demonstrates widespread pension miscalculation issues even in PBGC-administered plans. Retirees should carefully review pension calculations and question discrepancies.
Numerous class action lawsuits have been filed alleging pension benefit miscalculations. Examples: Xerox pension miscalculation (settled for $45 million, 2008) - alleged Xerox miscalculated benefits during cash balance plan conversion. AT&T pension miscalculation (settled for $30 million, 2004) - alleged AT&T failed to include certain compensation in pension calculations. IBM cash balance plan litigation (multi-year litigation, mixed results) - alleged age discrimination and wear-away issues in cash balance conversion; some claims succeeded, others dismissed. General Motors pension miscalculation - alleged GM miscalculated benefits for salaried employees; ongoing litigation. Significance: Pension miscalculations are common and can affect thousands of retirees. Class actions provide mechanism for correcting systemic errors. Retirees should review calculations and consider consulting actuary if discrepancies suspected.
During COVID-19 pandemic, unemployment benefits expanded dramatically (additional $600/week federal supplement, extended duration, Pandemic Unemployment Assistance for self-employed). Fraudsters exploited overwhelmed state systems and relaxed verification procedures, stealing an estimated $87 billion through identity theft, fake claims, and organized fraud rings. Legitimate claimants have faced: overpayment demands (state incorrectly paid benefits then demands repayment), frozen accounts while state investigates fraud, prosecution for fraud they did not commit (identity theft victims), and tax liabilities for benefits they never received (fraudster used their identity). States are aggressively pursuing recovery, sometimes garnishing tax refunds and wages. Claimants receiving overpayment notices can request waivers if: overpayment was not their fault and repayment would cause financial hardship. Significance: Largest fraud affecting government benefits program in U.S. history. Demonstrates importance of identity theft protections. Legitimate claimants must document they did not receive or request fraudulent benefits.
FMLA interference and retaliation cases regularly result in substantial verdicts and settlements. Examples: Bachelder v. American West Airlines (jury verdict $1.6 million, 2000) - fired for taking FMLA leave; awarded back pay, front pay, and liquidated damages. Evans v. Books-A-Million (jury verdict $1.57 million, 2009) - wrongfully terminated after FMLA leave; awarded compensatory and punitive damages. Novak v. MetroHealth Medical Center (jury verdict $12 million, 2015) - fired in retaliation for FMLA leave; awarded back pay, front pay, liquidated damages, and emotional distress damages (later reduced on appeal but substantial award affirmed). Numerous settlements in $100,000-$500,000 range. Significance: FMLA provides generous remedies (liquidated damages, emotional distress, mandatory attorney fees) making cases valuable. Employers face substantial liability for FMLA violations. Unlike ERISA cases (limited to denied benefits), FMLA cases can yield multi-million dollar awards.
Numerous 401(k) excessive fee class actions have resulted in substantial settlements. Employers have fiduciary duty under ERISA to ensure plan fees are reasonable and to monitor service providers. Allegations: plan sponsors selected high-fee investment options (often proprietary funds earning revenue sharing for sponsor), failed to negotiate lower fees available to large plans, allowed excessive recordkeeping fees, and included underperforming funds. Major settlements: Lockheed Martin - $62 million (2022), Boeing - $57 million (2020), NYU - $6 million (2020), Anthem - $23.5 million (2018), Ameriprise - $27.5 million (2019), Emory University - $9.5 million (2020), MIT - $7.75 million (2019). Settlements typically provide lump sum to class (all plan participants during class period), reducing participants' future fees, and improving plan investment options. Significance: Demonstrates importance of fiduciary duty to minimize fees. Even small fee differences (0.5% annually) compound over decades, costing workers hundreds of thousands in retirement savings. Excessive fee litigation has resulted in widespread fee reductions across 401(k) industry.
Benefits disputes are governed by a complex web of federal statutes, state laws, and regulations. Understanding which legal framework applies to your specific benefit determines your procedural rights, available remedies, and litigation strategy.
Comprehensive federal law enacted in 1974 governing most private employer benefit plans, including health insurance, disability insurance, life insurance, pension plans, 401(k) plans, and some severance plans. ERISA's purposes: protect plan participants, ensure plans are adequately funded, provide disclosure of plan information, establish fiduciary standards, provide remedies for violations. Key ERISA provisions: Section 502(a) provides civil enforcement mechanisms (sue for denied benefits, breach of fiduciary duty, etc.). Section 503 requires plans to provide written notice of denied claims and internal appeals procedures. Section 404 establishes fiduciary duties (act solely in interest of participants and beneficiaries, prudent person standard, diversify investments, follow plan terms). ERISA preempts state law for covered benefits, meaning you cannot sue in state court or recover state-law remedies (punitive damages, emotional distress). Limitations: remedies limited to denied benefits, no jury trial, deferential standard of review if plan grants discretion, administrative exhaustion required. Advantages: attorney fees may be awarded to prevailing participants, federal court jurisdiction (no need to meet diversity jurisdiction), uniform federal law (not subject to state-law variations). Critically important: Determine whether ERISA applies to your benefit, as it dramatically affects strategy.
Federal program providing monthly benefits to workers who paid into Social Security (FICA taxes) and become disabled before retirement age. Eligibility: sufficient work credits (typically 20 credits in last 10 years before disability, though varies by age) and meet SSA's definition of disability (inability to engage in substantial gainful activity due to medically determinable impairment expected to last 12+ months or result in death). Administered by Social Security Administration (SSA). Regulations at 20 CFR Part 404. Disability determination uses five-step sequential evaluation. Benefits: monthly payment based on average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) and Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) calculation (same as retirement benefits formula). Average SSDI benefit approximately $1,537/month (2024). Maximum SSDI benefit approximately $3,822/month (2024). Also eligible for Medicare after 24 months of SSDI. 5-month waiting period before benefits begin. Appeals process: Initial application → Reconsideration → ALJ hearing → Appeals Council → Federal District Court → Court of Appeals → Supreme Court. Average timeline to ALJ hearing: 12-24 months. Represented claimants have significantly higher approval rates.
Federal need-based program providing monthly benefits to disabled, blind, or aged (65+) individuals with limited income and resources. Administered by SSA. Regulations at 20 CFR Part 416. Eligibility: meet SSA's disability definition (same as SSDI) or be age 65+ or blind, and have countable resources less than $2,000 individual/$3,000 couple, and have countable income below program limits. Benefit amount: federal benefit rate $943 individual/$1,415 couple (2024), reduced by countable income. Some states supplement federal benefit. SSI recipients automatically qualify for Medicaid. No work history required (unlike SSDI). No waiting period. Appeals process same as SSDI. Differences from SSDI: SSI is need-based (financial eligibility), SSI has no retroactive benefits before application date, SSI benefits are lower, SSI does not lead to Medicare (leads to Medicaid instead). Can receive both SSDI and SSI if SSDI benefit is low and meet SSI financial limits.
Regulatory framework SSA uses to determine disability (applies to both SSDI and SSI). 20 CFR 404.1520 and 416.920. Five steps: (1) Are you engaged in substantial gainful activity (SGA)? SGA level: $1,550/month for non-blind, $2,590 for blind (2024). If earning above SGA, not disabled. (2) Do you have a severe impairment? Severe means more than slight abnormality with minimal effect on ability to work, expected to last 12+ months or result in death. If not severe, not disabled. (3) Does your impairment meet or medically equal a Listing? Listings (20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1) specify impairments considered automatically disabling if criteria met. Examples: certain cancers, cardiovascular conditions, neurological disorders, mental disorders, immune system disorders, etc. If meet/equal Listing, disabled. (4) Can you perform past relevant work (PRW)? SSA assesses physical and mental demands of jobs you performed in last 15 years. If you can perform PRW, not disabled. (5) Can you perform any other work? SSA considers residual functional capacity (RFC - most you can do despite limitations), age, education, and work experience. Uses Medical-Vocational Guidelines (Grid Rules) or vocational expert testimony. If no jobs exist you can perform, disabled. If jobs exist, not disabled. Burden of proof: claimant has burden through step 4; SSA has burden at step 5.
Federal law governing benefits for veterans, including disability compensation, pension, healthcare, education (GI Bill), home loans, and life insurance. Administered by Department of Veterans Affairs. Disability compensation (38 USC 1110 et seq.): monthly tax-free benefit for veterans with disabilities connected to military service. Requires service connection (in-service event + current disability + nexus). Ratings 0% to 100% based on VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) at 38 CFR Part 4. Presumptive service connection for certain conditions (Agent Orange, burn pits, Gulf War syndrome, etc.). Appeals: Under Appeals Modernization Act (AMA, 38 USC 7105), veterans have three appeal options (supplemental claim, higher-level review, Board appeal). If Board denies, appeal to Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC), then Federal Circuit, then Supreme Court. VA operates under non-adversarial, pro-claimant system (duty to assist). VA must obtain service treatment records, develop evidence, and give benefit of the doubt to veteran if evidence is in equipoise (at least as likely as not). Despite pro-claimant framework, many claims are denied due to lack of nexus or insufficient evidence. Veterans Service Organizations (DAV, American Legion, VFW) provide free representation.
Comprehensive regulation listing diagnostic codes and rating criteria for thousands of medical conditions. Each body system has separate section (musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, mental disorders, etc.). Each diagnostic code specifies rating percentages (0%, 10%, 20%, etc.) based on severity of symptoms and functional limitations. Example: Diagnostic Code 5003 (arthritis) ratings based on limitation of motion, pain on motion, and whether joints are weight-bearing. Example: Diagnostic Code 9411 (PTSD) ratings: 0% (documented but not severe enough for 10%), 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, or 100% based on symptom severity, social/occupational impairment, and functioning. VASRD applies analogous diagnostic codes if specific condition is not listed. Combined ratings: When multiple conditions are service-connected, VA uses combined ratings table (38 CFR 4.25) to calculate combined rating (not simple addition - uses diminishing efficiency formula). Ratings are rounded to nearest 10%. VASRD is subject to periodic updates. Some conditions have outdated criteria not reflecting modern medicine.
Federal law enacted in 1993 providing unpaid, job-protected leave for specified family and medical reasons. Regulations at 29 CFR Part 825. Coverage: private employers with 50+ employees, public agencies, schools. Eligibility: employee worked 12 months, 1,250 hours in past 12 months, employer has 50+ employees within 75 miles. Entitlements: up to 12 workweeks unpaid leave per 12-month period for: employee's serious health condition, care for family member with serious health condition, birth/adoption of child, or qualifying military exigency. Also 26 weeks military caregiver leave. Employee entitled to return to same or equivalent position, continuation of health insurance, and cannot be retaliated against. Remedies for violations: lost wages, liquidated damages (2x back pay if willful violation), reinstatement, front pay, compensatory damages (emotional distress, in some circuits), and mandatory attorney fees to prevailing employee. FMLA is separate from ERISA - not subject to ERISA limitations. Far more generous remedies than ERISA. Does not require exhaustion of internal appeals - can sue directly. 2-year statute of limitations (3 years if willful). Suits filed in federal or state court.
Federal civil rights law prohibiting discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Title I (employment) prohibits employers with 15+ employees from discriminating based on disability and requires reasonable accommodations. "Disability" means physical or mental impairment substantially limiting major life activity. Employers must provide reasonable accommodations (job restructuring, modified schedule, assistive equipment, leave) unless undue hardship. Relationship to benefits disputes: ADA is sometimes asserted alongside FMLA or benefits claims. Example: employer terminates employee for disability-related absences (may violate ADA if reasonable accommodation would allow employee to perform essential functions, and may violate FMLA if absences were for serious health condition). ADA reasonable accommodation may include leave beyond FMLA 12 weeks (though not indefinite leave). Remedies: back pay, front pay, reinstatement, compensatory damages (emotional distress), punitive damages (if employer acted with malice or reckless indifference, capped based on employer size), attorney fees. Claims filed with EEOC (administrative exhaustion) then lawsuit in federal court.
Federal law imposing unemployment tax on employers to fund unemployment insurance program jointly with states. FUTA tax rate: 6.0% on first $7,000 of each employee's wages. Employers receive credit (up to 5.4%) for state unemployment taxes paid, resulting in effective federal rate of 0.6%. FUTA establishes minimum standards for state unemployment programs but allows states to administer programs and set benefit levels, eligibility requirements, and disqualifications. States must conform to certain federal requirements to receive FUTA funds. Federal-State Extended Benefits (EB) program provides additional weeks of benefits (funded 50% federal, 50% state) when state unemployment rate is high. During economic crises, Congress sometimes enacts fully federal extended benefits (e.g., Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation during COVID-19). Unemployment benefits are subject to federal income tax (though not subject to FICA).
Each state administers its own unemployment insurance program under state law, subject to minimum federal standards. Key state-law variations: weekly benefit amount (Florida max $275, Massachusetts max $1,129), benefit duration (Florida 12-23 weeks, most states 26 weeks, Massachusetts 30 weeks), base period definition (standard vs. alternate), monetary eligibility requirements (minimum earnings), partial benefits formulas (amount disregarded and offset rate), waiting week (some states yes, some no), work search requirements (number of contacts per week), disqualifications for voluntary quit and misconduct (definitions vary), employer charging rules (whether base period employers are charged for benefits paid). Appeals: state appeals board/tribunal, then state court (judicial review). States have separate agencies administering unemployment (e.g., California Employment Development Department, New York State Department of Labor, Texas Workforce Commission). Claimants must understand their specific state's rules, as variations are dramatic.
Federal agency created by ERISA to insure defined benefit pension plans. When private sector defined benefit plan terminates with insufficient assets to pay promised benefits, PBGC takes over plan and pays benefits up to legal maximum limits. PBGC insurance is mandatory for most private sector defined benefit plans (premium paid by plan sponsor). PBGC maximum guaranteed benefit (2025): $75,000/year for 65-year-old retiree in single-employer plan, lower if benefits begin before age 65, higher if after age 65. Multi-employer plan guarantees are much lower (based on years of service × multiplier). PBGC does not guarantee: benefits above maximum, certain early retirement supplements, benefits from recent plan amendments (phase-in rule), or non-pension benefits. PBGC funded by insurance premiums, assets from trusteed plans, and investment income. PBGC maintains missing participants database. When plan terminates, PBGC becomes plan administrator and participants deal with PBGC for benefits. PBGC's benefit determinations can be appealed (internal appeals, then lawsuit in federal court under ERISA).
If ERISA plan grants the administrator discretionary authority to determine eligibility or interpret plan terms, courts review benefit denials under the highly deferential "arbitrary and capricious" standard (also called "abuse of discretion"). Under this standard, courts uphold denials unless they are unreasonable, without rational basis, or not supported by substantial evidence. Practically, courts affirm 70-80% of denials under arbitrary and capricious review. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch (1989) established that discretionary clauses trigger deferential review. Metropolitan Life v. Glenn (2008) held conflict of interest (insurer decides and pays) is a factor, but courts still give substantial deference. Some states (California, Delaware, Illinois, etc.) prohibit discretionary clauses in insurance policies issued in state, requiring de novo review. Under de novo review (no deference), courts independently assess evidence and approve claims approximately 50% of the time. Lesson: whether plan contains discretionary clause is critical. Review plan document. If purchasing individual disability policy, avoid policies with discretionary clauses.
If ERISA plan does not grant administrator discretionary authority, courts review benefit denials de novo (no deference to administrator's decision). Court independently reviews administrative record and determines whether claimant is entitled to benefits under plan terms. Standard of proof: preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not). De novo review results in significantly higher approval rates (approximately 50%) compared to arbitrary and capricious review (20-30% approval). Courts weigh medical evidence, consider treating physician opinions, assess credibility, and apply plan definitions independently. Conflict of interest (insurer decides and pays) is more significant under de novo review. Some courts apply heightened scrutiny when conflict exists. Strategic importance: If purchasing individual disability policy (not subject to ERISA) or if employer is considering plan amendments, avoid discretionary clauses to ensure de novo review if claim is litigated. Some states prohibit discretionary clauses, requiring de novo review for policies issued in state.
Federal law providing monthly benefits and medical coverage to coal miners totally disabled by pneumoconiosis (black lung disease) and to survivors of miners who died from the disease. Administered by Department of Labor, Division of Coal Mine Workers' Compensation. Eligibility: coal miner employed in underground mines or surface mines, totally disabled due to pneumoconiosis arising out of coal mine employment. Presumptions: if 15+ years coal mine employment and X-ray or biopsy shows pneumoconiosis, presumed totally disabled due to pneumoconiosis. Rebuttable by coal company. Benefits: monthly payment varying by number of dependents ($752.90 miner alone, $1,505.70 with 3+ dependents in 2024) plus medical coverage for black lung disease. Funded by excise tax on coal. Procedure: file claim with Department of Labor. If denied, hearing before Administrative Law Judge. Appeals to Benefits Review Board, then federal circuit court. Coal companies contest most claims aggressively, hiring doctors to diagnose smoking-related disease rather than coal mine dust exposure. Representation by black lung clinics or private attorneys is critical.
ERISA Title I establishes protections for defined benefit pension plans. Key provisions: Vesting - benefits must vest (become non-forfeitable) within certain timeframes (5-year cliff vesting or 3-7 year graded vesting). After vesting, employer cannot forfeit your accrued benefit. Accrual rules - plans must accrue benefits ratably over service years (cannot backload benefits). Funding requirements - employers must fund plans adequately to pay promised benefits (enforced by IRS and PBGC). Plan must have minimum funded status. If plan is critically underfunded, PBGC may take over. Anti-cutback rule - plan amendments cannot reduce accrued benefits (benefits already earned are protected). Spousal protections - married participants must elect joint and survivor annuity unless spouse consents in writing to single life annuity. Survivor receives 50% or more of participant's benefit. QDRO procedures - allows division of benefits in divorce. Disclosure - plan must provide Summary Plan Description, annual funding notice, and benefit statements. Claims procedures - plan must have reasonable claims and appeals procedures, provide written denial with specific reasons, and allow at least 60 days to appeal. Remedies: sue in federal court under ERISA Section 502(a) for denied benefits, breach of fiduciary duty, or failure to provide information.
401(k) plans are defined contribution plans governed by ERISA and Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k). Employee elective deferrals (contributions) are pre-tax (traditional 401k) or post-tax (Roth 401k). Annual limits: $23,000 elective deferrals + $7,500 catch-up if age 50+ (2024). Employer matching contributions common (e.g., 50% of first 6% of salary). Vesting: employee contributions always 100% vested; employer contributions subject to vesting schedule (immediate, 3-year cliff, or 2-6 year graded). Fiduciary duties: plan sponsor and investment committee are ERISA fiduciaries with duties to select and monitor prudent investment options, ensure reasonable fees, and act solely in interest of participants. Investment options: typically mutual funds, target-date funds, stable value funds, employer stock (controversial due to concentration risk). Participants direct investments. Distributions: penalty-free withdrawals after age 59½; required minimum distributions (RMDs) begin at age 73. Early withdrawal penalties (10% plus income tax) with exceptions (hardship, disability, separation from service after age 55, etc.). Loans allowed (up to $50,000 or 50% of vested balance, must repay within 5 years). Common disputes: excessive fees (class actions), imprudent investment options, failure to make matching contributions, delays in depositing contributions, prohibited transactions. Remedies: sue under ERISA for breach of fiduciary duty, recover losses to plan, attorney fees.
QDRO is court order in divorce case directing retirement plan to pay portion of participant's benefits to alternate payee (former spouse). ERISA generally prohibits assignment of benefits, but creates exception for QDROs. To be "qualified," order must: specify participant and alternate payee names and addresses, specify amount or percentage of benefit payable to alternate payee, specify number of payments or time period, specify each plan to which it applies, and not require plan to provide benefit type or form not otherwise available. Each plan has QDRO procedures and model forms. QDRO can divide 401(k) accounts (alternate payee receives separate account balance) or pensions (alternate payee receives portion of monthly benefit). For pensions, QDRO can provide alternate payee receives payments starting earlier than participant retires (if plan allows). QDRO process: draft order conforming to plan's requirements, submit to plan administrator for review, plan determines if order is qualified, if qualified, court enters order, plan implements. Common errors: order does not meet plan requirements (rejected), ambiguous language, incorrect benefit calculation, attempting to require benefit form plan doesn't offer. QDRO specialists (attorneys or QDRO drafting services) essential - mistakes can result in former spouse receiving nothing or participant paying more than required.
Benefits laws vary by jurisdiction - federal ERISA protects health, disability, and retirement benefits with a 180-day appeal deadline, while PTO laws vary by state. Our AI analyzes your specific benefit type, applicable laws (ERISA, state PTO statutes), and guides you through the appeal or lawsuit process. You earned these benefits - don't let denials go unchallenged.
Social Security Disability Process: Five Levels of Appeal
The Social Security disability process is notoriously lengthy and complex, with initial denial rates around 70%. Understanding each level of appeal, typical timelines, and the importance of representation is crucial. The process can take 2-3 years to reach an ALJ hearing, the level where most approvals occur.
File online at SSA.gov, by phone (1-800-772-1213), or in person at local Social Security office. Application requires: detailed work history (15 years); all medical sources (doctors, hospitals, clinics) with addresses and phone numbers; medications and dosages; medical test results; and daily activity descriptions. SSA will request medical records from your providers. Decision typically takes 3-6 months. Approval rate: approximately 30% (70% denied). Reasons for denial: insufficient medical evidence, SSA consultative exam finding you capable of work, earnings above substantial gainful activity level ($1,550/month in 2024 for non-blind), or impairment not expected to last 12+ months.
First level of appeal. Must be filed within 60 days of initial denial (plus 5 days for mail). Reconsideration is a complete review by a different SSA examiner who did not participate in initial decision. You can submit new medical evidence. Unfortunately, approval rate at reconsideration is only 10-15% (85-90% denied again). Many disability advocates question the value of reconsideration level. Decision typically takes 3-5 months. Note: Some states (AL, AK, CA (Los Angeles North and West branches), CO, LA, MI, MO, NH, NY, PA) have eliminated reconsideration level under prototype program, allowing claimants to proceed directly to ALJ hearing after initial denial.
Most important level - approximately 50% approval rate. Must be filed within 60 days of reconsideration denial. This is where representation matters most. Hearing is conducted by an Administrative Law Judge employed by SSA's Office of Hearings Operations (OHO). Typical hearing length: 30-60 minutes. Claimant testifies about conditions, limitations, daily activities, and work history. Medical expert (ME) may testify about severity of conditions. Vocational expert (VE) testifies about whether jobs exist that claimant could perform given age, education, work experience, and residual functional capacity. Hearing is recorded. Critical: Submit updated medical records showing worsening condition or continued disability. Obtain supportive opinion letters from treating physicians. Consider obtaining Residual Functional Capacity (RFC) questionnaires from doctors specifying sit/stand/walk/lift limitations. Wait time for hearing: 12-24 months depending on office (major backlog - approximately 500,000+ pending ALJ hearings nationally). Decision issued 1-3 months after hearing. Fully favorable decision: benefits approved from alleged onset date. Partially favorable decision: benefits approved but from later date. Unfavorable decision: denied.
If ALJ denies claim, you can request Appeals Council review. Must be filed within 60 days of ALJ decision. Appeals Council is part of SSA. Reviews ALJ decision for errors of law or abuse of discretion. Can deny review (vast majority of cases), remand case back to ALJ for further proceedings, or issue its own decision. Appeals Council rarely reverses ALJ denials (grants review in less than 20% of cases, and reverses only a fraction of those). Can submit new evidence only if it: (1) is new and material, (2) relates to period on or before ALJ decision, and (3) you show good cause for not submitting it earlier. Decision typically takes 12-18 months (major backlog). If Appeals Council denies review, you receive a "dismissal" notice, which allows you to proceed to federal court.
Final level of appeal. Must be filed within 60 days of Appeals Council decision. Filed in U.S. District Court for your district. This is a civil action under 42 USC 405(g) seeking review of the Commissioner's final decision. Review is based on administrative record (generally cannot add new evidence). Standard of review: whether ALJ decision is supported by substantial evidence and whether ALJ applied correct legal standards. District courts reverse and remand approximately 45-50% of cases (relatively high rate compared to other agency appeals). If reversed, case is typically remanded to ALJ for new hearing or further proceedings. Attorneys experienced in Social Security disability are essential at this level. Attorney fees: if you win, SSA pays your attorney directly from past-due benefits (capped at 25% of past-due benefits or $7,200, whichever is less, under EAJA fee petition). If district court rules against you, can appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals (2-3 years additional time), and theoretically to U.S. Supreme Court (rarely granted).
Important Notes
Representation matters: Claimants with attorney or advocate representation have significantly higher approval rates (approximately 60% at ALJ level vs. 30% for unrepresented claimants). Most disability attorneys work on contingency (no fee unless you win). Attorney fees capped by statute at 25% of past-due benefits or $7,200, whichever is less, plus potential EAJA fees. Medical evidence is crucial: Detailed Residual Functional Capacity (RFC) assessments from treating physicians specifying your functional limitations (sit/stand/walk/lift/carry limits, need for breaks, concentration limitations, absenteeism) are the most important evidence. Objective medical tests (MRI, CT, X-ray, EMG, bloodwork) supporting your conditions are critical. RFC assessment: The ALJ determines your RFC - the most you can do despite your limitations. If your RFC is limited to sedentary work and you are age 50+, special Medical-Vocational Guidelines (Grid Rules) may direct a finding of disabled. Average timeline: From initial application to ALJ hearing decision averages 2-3 years. From initial application through federal court can exceed 4-5 years. Retroactive benefits: If approved, you receive retroactive benefits dating back to your alleged onset date (SSDI) or application date (SSI), minus 5-month waiting period for SSDI.